David Wright writes:
> I don't think this is the problem you think it is. It's actually
>
> myMusic = \relative c' { c4 d e f | } \myMusic
>
> where the definition of myMusic tries to eat itself.
Not really. The parser wants to know from the lexer whether something
The piece I am setting has a flute cadenza which is notated in standard
size notes totalling 14 crotchets (quarter-notes) in length. The whole
cadenza is written between 2 successive barlines.
The prevailing time signature at this point is 6/8, and in the cadenza
all of the other instruments
On 13 April 2018 at 11:48, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 13 April 2018 at 10:00, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> How about pointing out what you find hard to understand in the
> >> documentation then?
> >
> >
> > I'm
On 4/13/2018 12:20 PM, Menu Jacques wrote:
Hello folks,
In the example below, chords are split over two voices by musicxml2ly,
as it found them (as harmonies) in the MusicXML file.
Would it be better to have only one chords part in such a case, to
have Ebm9 at the same horizontal level as
Hi,
what is in the musicxml? One or two chord tracks?
What is your goal?
If there are two intentionally in xml, musicxml2ly should keep them.
If you ask what would make sense for the ly file, one would be better.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user
Hello Joram,
> Le 13 avr. 2018 à 19:31, Noeck a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> what is in the musicxml? One or two chord tracks?
Two tracks.
> What is your goal?
I wondered if moving all chords to a single staff was was the trouble.
>
> If there are two intentionally in xml,
Hi all
Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this minimal example?
I would expect the included file to be relative to the location of the
file which includes it, not to the current working directory. What do
you think?
The only workaround is using the --include option?
[build (master *+)]$
On Fri 13 Apr 2018 at 19:01:27 (+0200), Federico Bruni wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this minimal example?
> I would expect the included file to be relative to the location of
> the file which includes it, not to the current working directory.
> What do you think?
>
Il giorno ven 13 apr 2018 alle 20:28, David Wright
ha scritto:
On Fri 13 Apr 2018 at 19:01:27 (+0200), Federico Bruni wrote:
Hi all
Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this minimal example?
I would expect the included file to be relative to the location of
Hi David,
it seems you have to add a manual barline at \cadenzaOff, but otherwise
I don’t see any problem with
%
\version "2.19.80"
<<
{
\time 6/8
2.
\cadenzaOn
\repeat unfold 14 { 4 }
\cadenzaOff
\bar "|"
2.
}
{
2.
2.*14/3\fermata
2.
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 12.04.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
>>
>> Marco,
>>
>> Got the 3’s on each group – see attached.
>>
>
> Finally you can tell LilyPond to automatically group consecutive tuplets:
>
> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
>
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 13 April 2018 at 09:15, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>> > I would expect the two scores generated by the following code were the
>> > same.
>> >
>> > \version "2.19.81"
>> > {a8
On 13 April 2018 at 10:00, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 13 April 2018 at 09:17, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >>
> >> > I didn't understand what I can do and how to
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> I didn't understand what I can do and how to use the \pushToTag and
> \appendToTag.
>
> Do you have a very simple example?
\pushToTag #'tag c' \tag #'tag {}
How about stating what you _want_ to do?
--
David Kastrup
I didn't understand what I can do and how to use the \pushToTag and
\appendToTag.
Do you have a very simple example?
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> I would expect the two scores generated by the following code were the
> same.
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> {a8 8}
> {a 8}
>
> Why lilypond treats them differently?
Because {a8 8} and {a8} are different? Spaces are not a relevant part
of input.
Oh! I will wait for it :)
Thank you David!
On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > var = {a b a}
> > {\var ~ a}
> >
On 13 April 2018 at 09:15, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I would expect the two scores generated by the following code were the
> > same.
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > {a8 8}
> > {a 8}
> >
> > Why lilypond treats them differently?
>
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 13 April 2018 at 09:17, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>> > I didn't understand what I can do and how to use the \pushToTag and
>> > \appendToTag.
>> >
>> > Do you have a very
Suppose that I define a variable so that according to a tag I can generate
a a a
or
a b a
Is there any way to make lilypond complaint with a compilation
error/warning in case I don't specify a \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag?
For example:
\version "2.19.81"
var = {
a
\tag#'vera a
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> var = {a b a}
> {\var ~ a}
>
> but this generates an error. This is just a simple example, the reason why
> I would like to do this is because the
On 13 April 2018 at 09:17, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I didn't understand what I can do and how to use the \pushToTag and
> > \appendToTag.
> >
> > Do you have a very simple example?
>
> \pushToTag #'tag c' \tag #'tag {}
>
> Thank
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 13 April 2018 at 10:00, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> How about pointing out what you find hard to understand in the
>> documentation then?
>
>
> I'm not a musician and I'm a young lilypond user. So I don't like come
> here and say
[ Is there any way to make lilypond complaint with a compilation
error/warning in case I don't specify a \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag?]
On 13 April 2018 at 15:17, Knute Snortum wrote:
> One way would be to use bar line checks (|) and \barNumberCheck:
>
> %%% Start
>
Am 12.04.2018 um 19:25 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
Marco,
In the attached I got the beaming you want. Do not know how to give each
tuplet is own 3.
Have a look at my answer to that question: setting subdivideBeams (and
baseMoment) is way easier than setting stemLeftBeamCount and
Am 12.04.2018 um 22:35 schrieb foxfanfare:
> Is this exactly how this function works?
Yes, you explained exactly what I meant. You get multiple fonts as you
described but you cannot add multiple fonts in one function call.
Joram
___
lilypond-user
At 11:48 on 13 Apr 2018, David Kastrup wrote:
>Gianmaria Lari writes:
>> I simply don't understand it. I don't understand it because: it is
>> too long, there are too many things, I don't understand the example
>> goal, and I don't understand the explication following the
One way would be to use bar line checks (|) and \barNumberCheck:
%%% Start
\version "2.19.81"
var = {
\time 3/4
a
\tag#'vera a
\tag#'verb b
a |
}
{\var} %this should generate a warning
{\keepWithTag #'vera \var} %this is ok!
{\keepWithTag #'verb \var} %this is ok!
{\removeWithTag
Mark Knoop writes:
> At 11:48 on 13 Apr 2018, David Kastrup wrote:
>>Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>> I simply don't understand it. I don't understand it because: it is
>>> too long, there are too many things, I don't understand the example
>>> goal, and I
Hi all,
I try to bring two projects together and finally get to the point where
I should properly learn what lilypond-book-preamble.ly actually does.
I have an infrastructure that retrieves and composes the material to be
engraved from several places and finally produces the output with
Hello folks,
In the example below, chords are split over two voices by musicxml2ly, as it
found them (as harmonies) in the MusicXML file.
Would it be better to have only one chords part in such a case, to have Ebm9 at
the same horizontal level as the other three chords, as MuseScore does in
31 matches
Mail list logo