Re: [ANN] LilyPad Preview 2

, Walter Hofmeister wrote: Ed, I noticed from the webpage that it lists Tiger OS X 10.4 as a requirement. Will it also work with 10.3? Some of us do not intent to go to 10.4. Walter Hofmeister ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

Zitat von Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net: Hello all, A question which has come up, and where I'm not sure what the answer or intention is. Lilypond is licensed under the GPL and reading through the license file, I didn't come across any granted exceptions (IIRC the

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

OK. Please consider my suggestion as obsolete, but I'd like to clarify what I intended to say (but obviously failed to do so) Quoting David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Would something like %@5 a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | be an option? The combination'%@' would

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

Hi Torsten, 5. Mai 2018 11:44, "Torsten Hämmerle" schrieb: > Hi Urs, > > Sibelius works fine: > > > Thanks. > > As my Dorico evaluation period has expired, I can't even start it. > All the

Re: Need someone testing XML file in Finale and Sibelius (and Dorico)

7. Mai 2018 18:51, "Jacques Menu Muzhic" schrieb: > Would it be a reasonable approach to have LilyPond first produce data in > memory, i.e. Scheme data > representing the whole score, and then either to produce the score or a MIDI > file or supply this > data to other

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Hi all, I must add some more confusion to this issue. I just had the opportunity to install a new OS from scratch and did (exactly) the following: * Install Ubuntu MATE 17.10 from DVD * sudo apt update * sudo apt upgrade * sudo apt install etckepper

Re: Fwd: frescobaldi 3

6. Januar 2018 12:27, "Blöchl Bernhard" schrieb: > Thanks for your kind support! > > To avoid a false delusion, in advance for list members jumping into this > thread the good message > for all linux users that the repository version of frescobaldi is always >

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

I have now finished a run-through of installation instructions. As I have once more renamed it the link is now https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Installing-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux-(Package-or-Source) I'd be glad about feedback: * confirmation * questions * reports about mistakes *

New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Hi all, after all the discussion about getting Frescobaldi to run on distributions based on Ubuntu < 17.xx I decided to give it a shot myself. TL;DR Frescobaldi *can* be installed on Ubuntu 16.04/Mint 18.3 from its own Git repositories and the Ubuntu package repositories without issues.

Fwd: Re: Engraver action every measure with Scheme

Forwarding to the list ... Weitergeleitete Nachricht --- Von: li...@openlilylib.org An: "Ed Harbison" Gesendet: 9. Januar 2018 10:59 Betreff: Re: Engraver action every measure with Scheme Hi Ed, 9. Januar 2018 09:30, "Ed Harbison" schrieb:

Re: A couple of questions about Edition Engraver

Hi David, 19. Februar 2018 12:00, "David Sumbler" schrieb: > As a newcomer to using Edition Engraver, and looking at the example > files etc., I wondered why they were written with so much repetition. > "Perhaps it is just to keep things easy for newcomers like me to >

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

23. Dezember 2017 03:30, "Simon Albrecht" )> schrieb: Hello everybody, just to let you know: After gathering from the recent thread that the situation with frescobaldi dependencies and conflicting versions of

Staff-brace-like horizontal spanner

Hi all, I'm looking for a way to create a horizontal spanner that looks like a PianoStaff brace, which automatically grows horizontally without scaling the whole shape. The model can be seen on this page: http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb10527451_00050.html Of

Different types of music expressions

Hi, I have a music-function that has to behave differently depending on the "type" of music it gets as an argument. Interpreting the music properties 'types and 'elements I was so far able to successfully discern * sequential music * single chords * single rhythmic events (but not if they're

Re: Temporarily split lyrics

2. April 2018 14:59, "Phil Holmes" schrieb: > Is http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=265 any use? Partially, thank you. I've realized (on lilybin) that I can start a new Lyrics context within the lyrics definition. Probably It'll work when I use named contexts to align to.

Re: Temporarily split lyrics

2. April 2018 15:01, "Malte Meyn" schrieb: > Am 02.04.2018 um 14:55 schrieb li...@openlilylib.org: > >> Hm, thanks for the idea, but the problem is that this would require the >> "empty" lyrics to actually >> start at the beginning of the piece. > > You could try

Re: Temporarily split lyrics

2. April 2018 14:49, "Malte Meyn" schrieb: > Am 02.04.2018 um 14:32 schrieb u...@openlilylib.org: > >> Hi all, >> >> what would be the most efficient way of typesetting lyrics that are >> split for a few words, ideally together with some sort of brackets >> similar to

Re: Changing Staff organization

Essentially, it sounds like you want 3 staves of vocal music and one piano staff (two staves), but you want to hide the vocal staves when they are resting and ditto for the piano, right? Create a score with 5 staves, keeping the vocal and piano parts separate (rather than using the two

Re: Idle curiousity about ancient Lily-lore

On 10/03/13 02:40, Jim Long wrote: Just curious, how did the absolute notation system come about? My main observations are that it is piano-centric, with { c d e f g a b c' } being an intuitive sequence, while { a b c d e f g a' } is less logical. Mmm, well, maybe that's not

Re: \relative is not the best way of entering complicated music

On 10/03/13 03:47, Sarah k Alawami wrote: 'd rather enter in the pitches like they are on a piano starting with c1 being low c and c8 being very high c all the way to the right of the keyboard. I assume you're a pianist? I'm not. So a piano-centric naming scheme would be of no use to me at

Re: Idle curiousity about ancient Lily-lore

On 10/03/2013 17:35, David Kastrup wrote: I have a hard time imagining what you'd be writing after \relative if you can't even remember the name of middle C. Without knowing at least_one_ absolute pitch, anchoring \relative will be a challenge. I simply crib the start of everything from

Re: \relative proposal: putting absolute pitches anywhere within \relative block using @-sign

On 13/03/2013 19:24, nothingwaver...@gmail.com wrote: Here's the idea. 1. Define absolute octave syntax with the @-sign (let it be a mnemonic for _A_bsolute) to be the syntax for temporarily specifying an ABSOLUTE PITCH within a \relative block, such that the next pitch, if it doesn't use the

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 15:04, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 03/30/2013 01:02 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote: On the other hand, user C /should/ be allowed to distribute source code under whatever license he wants to /as long as he doesn't ship the GPL libraries with it./ It's useless without them, but

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 15:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/02/2013 03:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: The main difference is work as a whole vs mere aggregation. If you include some file as a form of invoking its documented interface, you form no new combined work. Indeed, which if I recall right

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 18:47, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: When you add to that the fact that the particular case we're concerned with involves copyleft licensing which gives a particular and precise definition to what is considered a derivative work, it really doesn't seem to me possible to just write

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 22:01, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/02/2013 09:50 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: OK, now let's consider a specific example. Here's a bit of C code that generates 100 random numbers and calculates their sum.

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 22:34, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/02/2013 11:17 PM, Anthonys Lists wrote: So as long as Google stuck to using interfaces that the kernel devs explicitly published to user space, then using those header files EXPLICITLY does NOT create a derivative work, and therefore

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 22:47, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/02/2013 11:28 PM, Anthonys Lists wrote: A derivative work is whatever the LAW says it is (whatever that is :-). NO open source licence defines the term derivative work, although they may give their own interpretation of what they think

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 22:31, David Kastrup wrote: Anthonys Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk writes: Indeed, this legal claim (that using functions creates a derivative work) is exactly the claim that Oracle tried with Android and Java, and they came a royal cropper with it. exactly in the meaning

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 23:28, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/03/2013 12:01 AM, Anthonys Lists wrote: But as I understand it, the lawsuit as actually sued said apis are copyright and you would have needed a licence to use the apis - to use Oracle's Java. That's exactly in line with what David said

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 23:31, David Kastrup wrote: Anthonys Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk writes: If they DID relicence it, then it is copyrightable Nonsense. An explicit license can be given for things not actually requiring a license for particular uses under current legal standards

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 23:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/02/2013 11:57 PM, Anthonys Lists wrote: On 02/04/2013 22:47, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Indeed, and a consequence of distributing a covered work under GPL-incompatible terms is that you lose the permissions granted under

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 02/04/2013 23:46, David Kastrup wrote: That wasn't what the lawsuit was about. It was not even what Oracle claimed the lawsuit to be about. The issue was the reimplementation of Java classes, not the_use_ of Java classes. Yes. But the only thing that Oracle could sue over was the use of

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 03/04/13 03:21, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 04/03/2013 01:14 AM, Anthonys Lists wrote: If your work does not include any of their work, then you don't need any permission to not copy their work! :-) But I'm not talking about copying. I'm talking about the right to use

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL

On 03/04/13 10:22, li...@ursliska.de wrote: I think there is one thing this discussion proves impressively: Things are much less non-ambiguous than most of the participants assume. Something I've learnt from my time on Groklaw is that the GPL is, in fact, extremely clear. The problem is that

Re: transposing instruments

On 17/07/10 05:02, James Lowe wrote: Jatziri, Hi James, Jatziri, See: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-big-page#Transpose I regularly am given music in 'A' or 'C' to write out and transpose for B-flat for the small orchestra I am in (for example I play

Re: Lilypond to typeset solfa style Indian music

On 28/07/10 18:21, Mike Solomon wrote: I'd recommend entering your lyrics like normal and using notes or spaces in the staff. Then, do massive amounts of transparency overrides and/or context removes. The internals reference should give you a lead on what to turn off. Also, check out:

Re: LilyPond Report 19

On 09/08/10 15:09, Graham Percival wrote: The LilyPond Report is back, with its two “grumpy-and-fluffy” editors! This issue contains some conference news, along with the regular release news, snippet of the report, news from the frog pond, and the bug report of the report! Come read

Re: (re?)directing compile output to a file

On 12/08/10 17:55, Joe Neeman wrote: Then I'm not sure. Isn't there some way, in windows, to check what arguments are used when you drag a file to a shortcut? Apart from that, according to the lilypond source, it will only print out the version string if stdin is a terminal. So perhaps you

Re: List-email Suggestion

got a badly behaved mail client that can't cope, don't force your fix onto everyone else. Why not do what I do, which is group by thread, and dump related groups into the same folder - separate your music from your other lists, for example. Cheers, Wol

Re: \partial with full measure rests

On 07/09/10 19:58, Jayaratna wrote: Dear all, I have been checking old posts for this same problems, but my case is slightly different, and I would like to ask your opinion/advice on this. I have a score ending with a partial measure, and some parts do not play on that measure. For

Re: List-email Suggestion

the subject line is a pain in the neck! If done WELL, it's okay (several lists I'm on do it). If done BADLY, however, a dodgy email client (like LookOut) turns it into a right pain in the neck. As for making the list the default reply-to, I'm on lists that do that. And on MANY an occasion, I've

Re: [Haskell] Re: List-email Suggestion

On 07/09/10 23:55, David Rogers wrote: * Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de [2010-09-07 22:22]: On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:10:59PM -0700, David Rogers wrote: I really only see two requests for change, which pop up again and again; those are of course the two recently discussed - making

Re: Repeating the same clef

On 15/10/10 22:18, Phil Holmes wrote: I made the comment since there had been a discussion about this terminology on .devel. BTW - staffs is a perfectly good plural of staff. Stave is a perfectly good singular of staves. And in music, as in English, the two words are pretty much

Re: OooLilyPond problem

On 12/11/10 20:09, Tim McNamara wrote: There has been a significant fork which may affect this particular Lilypond project. Many/possibly most of the OOo developers quit the OOo project and have started LibreOffice in protest against the parent company that was paying for OOo development. I

Re: A thought on Windows Experience

On 09/12/2013 06:12, James Harkins wrote: My flippant response makes it sound like any reasonably intelligent person would find the right information fairly quickly, casting the problem in terms of user carelessness. That was a misstatement. My point is that reasonably intelligent, reasonably

Re: A thought on Windows Experience

On 05/12/2013 02:09, Tim McNamara wrote: Powerful software and simple software are usually mutually exclusive. Compare Word, Pages and LaTeX, for example. Pages is more elegant but can do a small fraction of what Word can do. Word can't do a lot of things that LaTeX can. Word is aimed at

Re: Guitars with capos

On 01/02/14 08:05, Federico Bruni wrote: 2014/2/1 Rachael Thomas Carlson r...@sleeplimited.org mailto:r...@sleeplimited.org Sometimes the standard notation is at sounding pitch and sometimes it is at pitch as if there were no capo. In all books I know (staff + tabstaff) I always

Re: short Musikmesse minutes

On 20/03/2014 10:30, Urs Liska wrote: I think that LilyPond's main strength is transformative use: different page formats, different media, different transpositions, individual variations. Yes, and I have/had the impression that it _is_ possible now to promote this feature. Of course I don't

Re: How do new users feel about LilyPond's documentation?

On 23/04/15 00:00, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, Hi Kieren (NB, I've read Thomas' response) What I'd like to see is worked, documented examples. I’m happy to supply a few… But there are so many questions: 1. Where would they be kept? Actually, the thought just struck me, maybe

Putting text IN the staff

Simple problem, I can't find the solution ... :-) Basically, what I want is \StaffOff ...text... \StaffOn. So, thinking treble clef, the text would be centred on the b line. Markup, however, seems to want to be above or below the staff, and that's it. How do I force it IN the staff, or am

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 26/04/2015 22:02, Anthonys Lists wrote: And, I'm not quite sure of what it was before, but having changed Take 2nd to D.S. to a rehearsal mark as you suggest, what do I get? STAIRCASING MARKUP AGAIN as it collides with the volta spanner! The text is supposed to be to the left of the barline

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 00:35, Thomas Morley wrote: Oh - and how do I get Score.VoltaBracket.shorten-pair to affect only the *second* bracket? Do I stick it between the two alternatives? I know when I tried something like that last time, it wouldn't even compile ... \alternative { { R2*2 } { \once

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 01:28, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, Hi Kieren, Thomas So I'm now having another go, and it's just blown up again !!! :-( It seems to me that there is too much addressing one issue, when my big problem is conflicting solutions! In other words, the solution to one problem

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 26/04/2015 22:02, Anthonys Lists wrote: As you suggested, I changed Allegretto con moto to a metronome mark (that's \tempo, right?) Instant result? STAIRCASING MARKUP AGAIN :-( wtf do I adjust now? The documentation is great at telling you HOW to change things, but not WHAT to change. I

Re: Creating LilyPond Object Models

On 26/04/2015 17:08, Urs Liska wrote: Hi Paul, I don't know if that's in any way related to our talk yesterday or if it has exclusively been triggered by Carl starting it. But this is very much a skeleton of what I was talking about! It would be absolutely great if you could pour that into a

Re: Do we really offer the future?

On 20/04/15 15:54, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Some say that Microsoft obtained its original OS dominance (which at one point was approaching 95%) specifically by giving the priority to non-users: it wilfully allowed (or even secretly supported) the proliferation of pirated copies of early

Re: mutopia's shortcomings

On 24/04/2015 12:42, Gilles wrote: Even if not everyone will agree on the standard layout, I feel that it is extremely important to define one, with the maximum flexibility. The problem arises, of course, when there are existing, conflicting, standards. There IS a standard out there, to

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

Hi, as mentioned by others your example is not very useful. Actually it puzzles me, I have _no_ idea about the intended output. Nevertheless, you happily mix different things all the time: TextScript and RehearsalMark. They have different usecases and different default settings. Anyway you

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 24/04/2015 23:48, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, Hope this helps! It has! So now I hope you see that Lilypond is *EXCELLENT* at handling collisions, if you simply correctly instruct her to do so. =) Cheers, Kieren. :-) Yup. It's just finding out how

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 00:35, Thomas Morley wrote: And please, this is_not_ a tiny example! You would significantly increase your chance to get help from the list if you'd try to reduce it to tiny examples only showing_one_ problem. I do appreciate that you don't want to look through too much code.

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 01:28, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, It seems to me that there is too much addressing one issue, when my big problem is conflicting solutions! In other words, the solution to one problem promptly screws up the solution to another! You need to apply the solution correctly to

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 01:08, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, How do I justify markup against a note? How about \once \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = #RIGHT ? That's what Thomas has kindly suggested. Except it's not working for me - his example works fine, my cut-n-paste doesn't ... what

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 24/04/2015 22:30, Carl Sorensen wrote: On 4/24/15 2:00 PM, Anthonys Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: On 24/04/2015 20:23, Simon Albrecht wrote: Please give us (code, eventually output) examples, else it¹s difficult to get your point. Yours, Simon pdf and relevant lily code attached

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 00:00, Anthonys Lists wrote: On 24/04/2015 23:48, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, Hope this helps! It has! So now I hope you see that Lilypond is *EXCELLENT* at handling collisions, if you simply correctly instruct her to do so. =) Cheers, Kieren

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 25/04/2015 00:44, Thomas Morley wrote: Thanks. That looks great EXCEPT I can't get it to work for me :-( I run your example, and it's bang on. I try to do the same in my part, and it don't work :-( You've got a rehearsal mark, followed by a right-aligned text markup. I copy your

Fixing overlapping notation

You can tell I've looked at the relevant section of the manual ... But I have two problems bugging me at the moment, and it's related to a problem I have in general with lilypond - it tries to avoid collsions by separating stuff vertically. How do I tell it to push them apart *horizontally*.

Re: How do new users feel about LilyPond's documentation?

On 22/04/15 20:19, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: I don't see anywhere in the reference or the manual where that sort of comprehensive style guide is presented. I'm thinking something like the doorstops O'Reilly's uses for documenting, say, HTML. I hate to use the term (it's already been ruined by

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 24/04/2015 20:54, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, I have in general with lilypond - it tries to avoid collsions by separating stuff vertically. How do I tell it to push them apart *horizontally* I have often asked about devising (and paying for) an automated system for this.

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

...) Cheers, Wol Am 24.04.2015 um 18:09 schrieb Anthonys Lists: You can tell I've looked at the relevant section of the manual ... But I have two problems bugging me at the moment, and it's related to a problem I have in general with lilypond - it tries to avoid collsions by separating stuff

Re: What is the problem with \relative? (Was: Do we really offer the future?)

On 23/04/15 20:35, Calixte Faure wrote: I learned music in French (native French) and was at the beginning a little bit confused with 2 4 8 16 etc. because we say white, black, hooked, double-hooked, triple-, etc. but after all it is logical with the numbers. I understood the choice of 2 4 8

Re: Fixing overlapping notation

On 24/04/2015 22:32, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, As mentioned by others, actual code samples will be much better than abstract complaints, if a solution is what you’re looking for. If squeezing notes closer causes markup to collide and staircase, that's VERY painful to me. Does this

Re: Putting text IN the staff

On 27/04/15 09:30, Nick Payne wrote: On 27/04/2015 08:14, Anthonys Lists wrote: Simple problem, I can't find the solution ... :-) Basically, what I want is \StaffOff ...text... \StaffOn. Something like this? The values for offset and makegap have to be fiddled with to get proper

Re: License of code posted to this list

On 09/05/2015 22:06, David Bellows wrote: I'm not sure so this maybe wrong. But AFAIK copyright for content posted to the list is by default with the author and has no license by itself. So I think you can't assume it's PD. This sounds correct as well. Does just making the code available to

Re: Bar Fermata at end of system?

On 17/05/15 12:51, Thomas Morley wrote: 2015-05-17 13:37 GMT+02:00 N. Andrew Walsh n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com: That fixed it, thanks so much! Is this the sort of stuff covered in the advanced/tweaks sections of the reference, or are they tricks one learns through practice? NR 5.4.7

Re: procedure vs. function

On 18/04/15 16:21, Urs Liska wrote: So the choice of these names is actually an inconsistency in LilyPond's terminology? I'm asking this because I have just completed a tutorial about define-music-function and its siblings, and I realized that I used the terms function and procedure in an

Re: procedure vs. function

On 18/04/15 19:56, PMA wrote: AFAIK, of our major ancestor languages, only Pascal insisted on a literal working function-vs-procedure distinction. Did Wirth ever defend this insistence (as more than a track-keeping enforcer re value-outputting vs non-value-outputting code)? Actually, so did

Re: procedure vs. function

On 18/04/15 22:11, PMA wrote: Aha. So the improper-er their code got, the tougher time compilers had trying to -- as Martin says -- throw it out. All told, is there now any real need _not_ to use the terms function and procedure interchangeably? That is, any real need to try to enforce

Re: title_page

On 19/04/15 00:33, bobr...@centrum.is wrote: I'm trying to make a title/cover page within LilyPond. I'm aware of the possibility of workarounds: lilypond-book/LaTeX; Strikes me as a bit ham-fisted, not sure if I would run into trouble as I've seen the warning about \pageBreak not playing

Re: Font trouble

On 18/04/15 22:57, Wols Lists wrote: I must admit this is an example of monkey see, monkey do coding, but I'm pretty certain I was given it on this list originally, this is the second time I've tried to do something like this, and it's most definitely not right ... I'm trying to replace

Re: volta repeat with and without alternative ending

On 24/06/15 18:42, Paul Scott wrote: Because in individual part score, it will look silly (alternative endings, but they are identical) Not silly at all. It lets the violists know the structure. What if the conductor says Start at the 2nd ending? How will the violist(s) know where to

Re: Snowballing

On 25/06/15 17:50, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello everyone, is it just me who has been having a kind of ‘snowballing’ problem on the -user and -devel lists for the last two days or so? Most of the mails arrive two up to six (!) times, and I’ve no clue why. A bug in mailman? I have

Re: Expanded fingering diagrams?

On 25/06/15 22:17, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: However, as the owner and player of (for example) a contrabassoon with a key layout that differs from the one provided, I'd like to know: what capabilities are there for expanding the library of diagrams? What about, for example, bass flute? Or the

Re: Snowballing

On 25/06/15 18:58, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 25.06.2015 um 19:05 schrieb Wols Lists: On 25/06/15 17:50, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello everyone, is it just me who has been having a kind of ‘snowballing’ problem on the -user and -devel lists for the last two days or so? Most of the mails arrive

Re: Sometimes order is significant

On 26/05/15 15:02, Knute Snortum wrote: Thanks for the reply and the cheat sheet. The way I look at it, is to look at the *meaning*, not the *representation*. First, you need the note, eg C above middle C, which is c''. Next comes whether to display any accidentals, which is a property of the

Re: Beam exceptions

On 16/08/15 04:28, Andrew Bernard wrote: In the following MWE, I would like to have the second bar have a primary beam across all the notes, as per the first bar. I imagine it may require more than what I have here, possibly something to do with setting up beamExceptions? How does one do this?

Re: Change size of notes in addQuote passage

On 24/08/15 19:32, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 24.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb owainsut...@gmail.com: Is there a way to (a) use 'transposedCueDuring' which retains these details from the original, Yes, see

Re: bug in german manual

On 18/08/15 14:56, David Kastrup wrote: Malte Meyn lilyp...@maltemeyn.de writes: Am 18.08.2015 um 09:01 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard: Thanks for clarifying my confusion. As long as I used lilypond I always used \tuplet and argue that I did not even know that \times was/is a possible

Re: format-mark function for A, B, C, …, X, Y, Z, Aa, Bb, Cc, …

On 16/08/15 20:21, Malte Meyn wrote: Hi list, sometimes there are more than 25 or 26 rehearsal marks in a piece. LilyPond’s format-mark-(alphabet|letters) function and friends continue after X, Y, Z with AA, AB, AC, … I have never seen this in printed scores. Instead all scores I’ve seen

Re: Font search path (Linux)

On 28/07/15 12:54, Malte Meyn wrote: Hi list, I would like to have the fonts from fonts.openlilylib.org in a directory that is not overridden when installing a new version of LilyPond but found by the program. Is this possible and if yes, where would that be? I use the installation

Re: Font search path (Linux)

On 28/07/15 14:06, Ralf Mattes wrote: No, this is ba advice: anything under /usr/ is owned and managed by the system/vendor (on linux most likely by the system's package manager). The system is free to (and often will) remove/overwrite these files. User/Admin installs should be put into

Re: \transpose and quoting

On 15/08/15 15:55, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello, I’m looking for a way to quote another voice, but in a different octave. My thinking was: ‘\quoteDuring is a music function, so it returns music, so I can wrap it into \transpose c c, {} and all’s fine.’ However, \transpose has no effect.

Re: Key Signature only on first staff

On 21/07/15 18:43, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello Brother Gabriel, Am 21.07.2015 um 19:11 schrieb BGM: My piece is in B Major and the repetition of the key signature takes up a lot of room on the page. I would like to show it on the first staff only and suppress the rest. That is unusual,

Re: sharping naturals

On 25/07/15 08:04, David Kastrup wrote: If we wanted to support natural English note entry, it would become LilyPond's problem. As an irrelevant aside :-) Throwing another little spanner in the works - about what words mean ... I really hate it when people say English, and mean American ...

Re: My finances for working on LilyPond

On 25/10/15 11:08, Chris Yate wrote: > As I understand it, there are some differences in the commission payable > for sending money to a friend vs buying a thing, but I've not looked > into it for a couple of years. We were investigating it for managing our > orchestra subs - I think it was about

Re: My finances for working on LilyPond

On 23/10/15 05:48, Jacques Menu wrote: > So, David, please send me your IBAN privately, and I’ll fix this problem on > my side. I know there's all this fuss about putting bank accounts on the web, but here (in the UK) we have bank accounts that can't originate transactions, and can't have an

Re: Lilypond 2.19.31 on openSUSE Leap 42.1

On 14/11/15 11:52, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Anybody running this combination? > > When attempting to run lilypond, libffi.so.6 is not found: > > error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > > > I am presently unable to

Re: [OT] Printer with or without Postscript

On 13/10/15 11:09, Johan Vromans wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:39:35 +1100 > Andrew Bernard wrote: > >> > Whatever page description >> > language your printer uses internally, the printer driver software on >> > your computer will convert your file to that language

Re: Printing movement titles in page header

On 09/07/15 09:05, Mark Knoop wrote: Thanks Jan-Peter, I'll take a look at this and post back if I make any progress. I was pointed at the scheme code that prints the header - can't remember what it was and I'm not on the computer with it so I can't get easy access. Find it and try modifying

Re: Printing movement titles in page header

On 09/07/15 19:48, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 09.07.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Wols Lists: On 09/07/15 09:05, Mark Knoop wrote: Thanks Jan-Peter, I'll take a look at this and post back if I make any progress. I was pointed at the scheme code that prints the header - can't remember what

  1   2   3   4   5   >