On 9/18/2016 3:34 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
> Cheers,
> Pierre
I'm cheering, all right! That worked beautifully, Pierre. All that
scheme code with coordinates... you must love this stuff.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
___
lilypond-user mailing li
Here's another possibility including clef changes:
\version "2.19.48"
%% clef C ladder style
#(define-markup-command (C_ladder-path layout props thk mlt) (number?
number?)
(interpret-markup layout props
(markup
(#:stencil
(make-path-stencil
'(M 0.000 -1.500
L 0.00
Just in case, for v2.18 version:
\version "2.18.2"
%%% Clef C Ladder Style defs:
ladderStyleClef =
\markup
\override #'(filled . #t)
\path #0.001
#'((moveto0.000 -1.500)
(lineto0.000 -1.850)
(curveto 0.000 -1.890 0.032 -1.920 0.075 -1.920)
(curveto 0.122 -1.92
Hi Karlin,
How about:
\version "2.19.48"
%%% Clef C Ladder Style defs:
myClefC = \markup\stencil
#(make-path-stencil
'(M 0.000 -1.500
L 0.000 -1.850
C 0.000 -1.890 0.032 -1.920 0.075 -1.920
C 0.122 -1.920 0.150 -1.890 0.150 -1.850
L 0.150 1.850
C
2016-09-17 21:28 GMT+02:00 Karlin High :
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: Re: Why the part-combining in American hymnals? (WAS:
> Beaming, partcombine and pickups)
> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:24:27 +0100
> From: J Martin Rushton
>
> ...In passing I also note the use of
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Why the part-combining in American hymnals? (WAS:
Beaming, partcombine and pickups)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:24:27 +0100
From: J Martin Rushton
...In passing I also note the use of the C-clef, but in an unusual
position that makes it
