On 16.05.2018 10:11, Menu Jacques wrote:
I’m not sure about R1*5/4
With R, it’s completely irrelevant how you write the duration.
R1*5/4*2
would be my favourite, but the following behave the same in every respect:
R4*10
R16*40
R\breve*5/4
Just to illustrate the concept.
Best, Simon
__
Hello Joram, Orm and Karim,
Thanks, it’s clear now!
JM
> Le 16 mai 2018 à 10:35, Orm Finnendahl
> a écrit :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 16. Mai 2018 um 10:11:30 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Menu Jacques:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> What is the best way to write such a length, that cannot be written with
>> dots?
Am Mittwoch, den 16. Mai 2018 um 10:11:30 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Menu Jacques:
> Hello folks,
>
> What is the best way to write such a length, that cannot be written with dots?
>
> I’m not sure about R1*5/4, and I thought R1 R4 would be OK for that, but:
as a general rule: If a full measure rest is
Dear Jacques,
I personally use R4*5 and this works as supposed to.
Hope this helps.
best
K
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:11:42AM -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:11:30 +0200
> From: Menu Jacques
> To: Lilyp
Dear Jacques,
> I’m not sure about R1*5/4, and I thought R1 R4 would be OK for that, but:
R1*5/4 is just fine.
> R1 R4 |
R1 means fill the duration of a whole note with a full measure rest.
Naturally after a full measure rest, the measure should end. But here it
does not. Therefore the ba
