Re: Stanza "number" alignment

2016-12-19 23:14 GMT+01:00 Br. Samuel Springuel : > On 2016-12-19 5:04 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: >> >> \once \override NoteColumn.X-offset = 3.5 > > > That works well too. Which will have more predictable results when the line > width and staff size changes? No idea. I'm

Re: Stanza "number" alignment

On 2016-12-19 5:04 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: \once \override NoteColumn.X-offset = 3.5 That works well too. Which will have more predictable results when the line width and staff size changes? I'm going to be using these snippets in both a "normal" and a "large print" booklet, eventually,

Re: Stanza "number" alignment

2016-12-19 15:53 GMT+01:00 Br. Samuel Springuel : > In the following snippet, is there a way to set the alignment of the "℟." so > that it always appears after the barline, rather than under it. I expect > more space needs to be added to the bar in which it appears for this

Re: Stanza "number" alignment

Br. Samuel Springuel wrote > ... the duration throwing off the later notes Ooops, I forgot that I changed the recent duration. Of course it shoud read g'4 f-sharp'( g') e' f-sharp' g' \bar ":|." Br. Samuel Springuel wrote > why `\hide r` instead of `s`? I > tested the later and it seems to

Re: Stanza "number" alignment

On 2016-12-19 11:56 AM, Klaus Blum wrote: \cadenzaOn \hide r8 \hide r8 \cadenzaOff Other than the duration throwing off the later notes (easily corrected) it works well. Out of curiosity, why `\hide r` instead of `s`? I tested the later and it seems to work too, is there a reason to favor

Re: Stanza "number" alignment

Br. Samuel Springuel wrote > is there a way to set the alignment of the > "℟." so that it always appears after the barline, rather than under it. I would simply fill the space between the barline and the first note with invisible rests. Br. Samuel Springuel wrote > is there a way to eliminate