cd /usr/local/lilypond grep -r define-line-markup *
doesn’t give me any results; I assume they’re not part of LilyPond.
On 04.09.2014 13:38, Richard Shann wrote:
The snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=750
for changing the markup used for chord names makes use of Scheme
procedures like
On 04/09/14 12:38, Richard Shann wrote:
The snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=750
for changing the markup used for chord names makes use of Scheme
procedures like define-line-markup, define-small-markup ...
I don't see these referenced anywhere in git or in this snippet.
Are you sure
At 12:48 on 04 Sep 2014, James wrote:
On 04/09/14 12:38, Richard Shann wrote:
The snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=750
for changing the markup used for chord names makes use of Scheme
procedures like define-line-markup, define-small-markup ...
I don't see these referenced anywhere in
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:48 +0100, James wrote:
On 04/09/14 12:38, Richard Shann wrote:
The snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=750
for changing the markup used for chord names makes use of Scheme
procedures like define-line-markup, define-small-markup ...
I don't see these
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 13:04 +0100, Mark Knoop wrote:
At 12:48 on 04 Sep 2014, James wrote:
On 04/09/14 12:38, Richard Shann wrote:
The snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=750
for changing the markup used for chord names makes use of Scheme
procedures like define-line-markup,
On 4 September 2014 13:18, Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com wrote:
this illustrates the meaning, but doesn't hint at how to create a
variant of the procedure (in my case, make-small-markup is too small).
If I recall, it's a scheme macro which generates these. It only works
for existing
At 13:41 on 04 Sep 2014, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 4 September 2014 13:18, Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com
wrote:
this illustrates the meaning, but doesn't hint at how to create a
variant of the procedure (in my case, make-small-markup is too
small).
If I recall, it's a scheme macro which
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:17 +0100, Mark Knoop wrote:
At 13:41 on 04 Sep 2014, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 4 September 2014 13:18, Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com
wrote:
this illustrates the meaning, but doesn't hint at how to create a
variant of the procedure (in my case,
