Hi Pierre and Harm,
Schneidy wrote
Examples of three different ways to scale a staff to twice its size:
Thanks for the tip Paul.
Il keep it for a future snippet in the LSR v2.20 (just 2 ways if you don't
mind).
You're welcome, and sounds good, I don't mind. I think it would be good to
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
The set-global-staff-size approach also seems
to leave the staff lines and stems proportionally thinner at larger
sizes.
… which is a good thing, since it preserves the optical impression
instead of keeping the numerical proportions.
If the proportions would remain
2014-06-29 11:09 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com:
Any clues how to do this?
\version 2.18.2
\markup\scale #'(.5 . .5) {
\score {
\new Staff { c''1 }
\layout {}
}
}
\version 2.19.8
\markup\scale #'(.5 . .5) {
\score {
That works great, thank you. The only further tweak I needed was to put
\large before the text so that text comes out at a normal size with the
music reduced.
Richard
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 11:40 +0200, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
2014-06-29 11:09 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann
2014-06-29 13:42 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com:
That works great, thank you. The only further tweak I needed was to put
\large before the text so that text comes out at a normal size with the
music reduced.
I'm trying to make an easy function for (without success) :
Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com writes:
2014-06-29 13:42 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com:
That works great, thank you. The only further tweak I needed was to put
\large before the text so that text comes out at a normal size with the
music reduced.
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com writes:
2014-06-29 13:42 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com:
That works great, thank you. The only further tweak I needed was to put
\large before
2014-06-29 15:35 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
LilyPond says :Expect: 2, found 1: ((0.5 . 0.5))
No, it doesn't. It says:
fatal error: make-scale-markup: Wrong number of arguments. Expect: 2,
found 1: ((0.5 . 0.5))
Ok
Then mySize is declared as a music function, but if it
Hi,
2014-06-29 15:40 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
This is what I got:
Ok, thanks, but I'd like to find something like :
\mySize #.5 \Score ...
without \markup in order to find an alternate code as :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=862
Cheers,
Pierre
2014-06-29 15:57 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2014-06-29 15:40 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
This is what I got:
Ok, thanks, but I'd like to find something like :
\mySize #.5 \Score ...
without \markup in order to find an
Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
2014-06-29 15:40 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
This is what I got:
Ok, thanks, but I'd like to find something like :
\mySize #.5 \Score ...
without \markup in order to find an alternate code as :
Hi Harm,
2014-06-29 16:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
are you aware that we have two commands called `score'?
One is a music-function the other a markup-command.
No I arn't.
I don't think you can replace the LSR-snippet-code with one outputting a
markup.
It's
2014-06-29 16:10 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
That does not make even sense as a rationale since the synopsis used in
that snippet is utterly different.
Ok.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
\version 2.19.8
mySize =
#(define-scheme-function (parser location nmbr score) (number? ly:score?)
(markup #:scale (cons nmbr nmbr) #:score score))
\mySize #.5
\score {
c''1
\layout {} %% needed even with 2.19.8
Because the
2014-06-29 16:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
You can get away without it by letting the parser deal with the score
markup:
Thanks,
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
Is this way of scaling a score (by putting it inside a markup) the best way
to do it, if you want to keep all of the proportions strictly consistent at
different sizes?
The approach in the staffSize snippet does not keep the proportions
consistent, which becomes apparent at larger
Hi Paul,
2014-06-29 19:10 GMT+02:00 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
Examples of three different ways to scale a staff to twice its size:
Thanks for the tip Paul.
Il keep it for a future snippet in the LSR v2.20 (just 2 ways if you don't
mind).
Cheers,
Pierre
\version 2.19.8
%=
2014-06-29 19:10 GMT+02:00 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
Hi all,
Is this way of scaling a score (by putting it inside a markup) the best way
to do it, if you want to keep all of the proportions strictly consistent at
different sizes?
The approach in the staffSize snippet does not keep
Am 29.06.2014 19:10, schrieb Paul Morris:
Hi all,
Is this way of scaling a score (by putting it inside a markup) the best way
to do it, if you want to keep all of the proportions strictly consistent at
different sizes?
The approach in the staffSize snippet does not keep the proportions
19 matches
Mail list logo
