On 14 March 2018 at 10:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From the "Extending LilyPond" guide:
> >>>
> >>> 1.2.1 LilyPond Scheme syntax
> >>> -
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> From the "Extending LilyPond" guide:
>>>
>>> 1.2.1 LilyPond Scheme syntax
>>>
>>>
>>> The Guile interpreter is part of LilyPo
On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>
>
> On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>> > On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup wrote:
>> >
>> >> Then Scheme expressions written using # in the middle of music are
>> >> expected to be music ex
On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Then Scheme expressions written using # in the middle of music are
> >> expected to be music expressions.
> >
> >> If you want to insert an actual
> >> duratio
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Then Scheme expressions written using # in the middle of music are
>> expected to be music expressions.
>
>> If you want to insert an actual
>> duration, you need to write it preceded with $ so that it can have
>> diff
On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > Just to understand how does it work the relation between scheme and
> > lilypond. Why this does not work?
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > { c#(+6 2) }
> >
> > I would expect this compile to
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
>
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> Just to understand how does it work the relation between scheme and
> lilypond. Why this does not work?
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> { c#(+6 2) }
>
> I would expect this compile to
>
> \version "2.19.81"
> { c8 }
So much wrong with this... First, (+6 2) calls 6 as function
