Noeck writes:
> Am 12.04.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Additionally remove the tuplet bracket
>>
>> \omit TupletBracket
>
> Or, if you want to keep them in case there is no beam (for quavers etc.):
>
> \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = #'if-no-beam
>
> Joram
>
>
> PS: Why is i
Am 12.04.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Additionally remove the tuplet bracket
>
> \omit TupletBracket
Or, if you want to keep them in case there is no beam (for quavers etc.):
\override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = #'if-no-beam
Joram
PS: Why is it "bracket-visibility" and not j
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 12.04.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
>>
>> Marco,
>>
>> Got the 3’s on each group – see attached.
>>
>
> Finally you can tell LilyPond to automatically group consecutive tuplets:
>
> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
>
> which removes the need
Thank you all :-)
2018-04-12 22:48 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 12.04.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
>
> Marco,
>
>
>
> Got the 3’s on each group – see attached.
>
>
>
>
> Rather than manually counting beamlets you can set beam subdivisions:
>
> \set subdivideBeams = ##t
> \se
Am 12.04.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
Marco,
Got the 3’s on each group – see attached.
Rather than manually counting beamlets you can set beam subdivisions:
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
and remove the manual beams.
Additionally remo
Marco,
Got the 3's on each group - see attached.
Mark
\version "2.19.80"
\relative c {
\clef bass
\time 4/4
\key bes \major
r8
\tuplet 3/2 8 {f16 \upbow -\markup { \line {\concat { \dynamic p } \italic { accel. e cresc. }}}
f f
ges16 ges16
\se
Rutger Hofman cs.vu.nl> writes:
>
> Hello list,
>
> the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
> time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends
> to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source.
>
> Can you please point me how I can
On 29 December 2011 16:23, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> Yes.
Thank you Graham for this raisoned and well-arhued answer.
Rutger, have a look at what 2 lead developers have recently said about
using development version:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00503.html
http://lis
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote:
>> >This is fixed in the latest development version.
>>
>> Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage?
>
> Yes.
The current version is an improvement in a number of ways, but you are,
f
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote:
> >This is fixed in the latest development version.
>
> Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage?
Yes.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
On 12/29/2011 03:18 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM
Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets?
Hello list,
the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
time, but if it is withi
- Original Message -
From: "Rutger Hofman"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM
Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets?
Hello list,
the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th e
Hello list,
the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends
to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source.
Can you please point me how I can fix this, e.g. with an autobeaming
rule/exceptio
The list of predefined beaming patterns is far from complete, as you have
noticed. The default rules are also a mix of general rules, for example that
a beam is always ended on the third beat in 4/4 meter, and specific rules
for certain note lenghts, for example that beams with 32nd notes are alwa
hello list,
i'm a beginner at lilypond, i know enough to enter music in a simple
way. i still don't know enough of the language to try elaborate tweaks,
but i find that usually lilypond is smart enough to produce good output
for music that's not too complex.
but i suspect that automatic beaming
This is issue #11; unfortunately it will likely remain for a while.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11
Sorry,
- Graham
David Bobroff wrote:
I'm having a similar issue with v2.11.32:
%%% BEGIN LILYPOND %%%
\version "2.11.32"
\score {
\relative c' {
\times 2/3 {
On 1 Oct 2007, at 16:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the strange beaming inside the tuplet in the first 4/8 measure of
this sniplet expected? Right now im overriding with manually setting
stemBeamCount to correct values, but its very tedious.
I have similar problems with some irregular me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Sorry for doubles, but the image file wasnt included in the post sent
from the web-interface. AV.]
Hi there.
Is the strange beaming inside the tuplet in the first 4/8 measure of
this sniplet ex
IMO the beaming should be the same for 2/4 or 4/8
i'd submit it as a bug unless someone chimes in...
d
(fwiw in 2.11.34 the spacing seems better)
On 1 Oct 2007, at 15:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Sorry for doubles, but the image file wasnt included in the post sent
from the web-interface. A
[Sorry for doubles, but the image file wasnt included in the post sent
from the web-interface. AV.]
Hi there.
Is the strange beaming inside the tuplet in the first 4/8 measure of
this sniplet expected? Right now im overriding with manually setting
stemBeamCount to correct values, but its ver
Hi there.
Is the strange beaming inside the tuplet in the first 4/8 measure of
this sniplet expected? Right now im overriding with manually setting
stemBeamCount to correct values, but its very tedious.
[2. image notation --- image/jpeg; lilypond-beaming-oddness.jpg]...
\version "2.10.20"
21 matches
Mail list logo
