* first of all, the links in src/ are broken, which led to a spectacular
make fork bomb :)
* make clean does some very funky things (log attached)
* compiling all of the plugins is not a good idea - on my system
compilation barfs because i dont have the wm headers. perhaphs (if not
autoconf then
Hi
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
> * first of all, the links in src/ are broken, which led to a spectacular
> make fork bomb :)
Hmmm... I was sure that the ln command always tries to create relative
symlinks. even if I give full pathes for both the source and te target.
But looking at the
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
>
> > * first of all, the links in src/ are broken, which led to a spectacular
> > make fork bomb :)
>
> Hmmm... I was sure that the ln command always tries to create relative
> symlinks. even if I give full p
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > * a rudimentary check of biditext shows that it works. a rudimentary
> > check of r2llib didnt take place because i had no idea how to test it -
> > emil? (my system has no hebrew specially set up, except maybe the
> > turkish patch for netscape).
[i
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> thanks. checknig with it - refreshd works :)
> now i get a nice segmentation violation in 'r2l'. will you be acting as
> the clearing house for all r2l patches (r2llib, biditext, r2l-plugins,
> refreshd) or should we
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> I've updated only the r2l-package and r2l tarballs (the rpm managed to
> build just fine anyway)
>
> http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/R2L/r2l-tarball/r2l-0.1.1.tar.gz
> http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/R2L/r2l-tarball/r2l-package.0.1.1.tar.gz
r2l-p
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > I've updated only the r2l-package and r2l tarballs (the rpm managed to
> > build just fine anyway)
> >
> > http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/R2L/r2l-tarball/r2l-0.1.1.tar.gz
> > http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
Hi muli,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>
> > BTW: emil: the only warning I saw was:
> >
> > g++ -g -D_REENTRANT -Wall -pedantic
> > -I/home/tzafrir/projects/LinClub/BiditextGui/r2l-tarball/r2l-0.1.1/include
> > -I/home/tzafrir/projects/LinC
hi guys,
http://www.pointer.co.il/~mulix/r2l/r2llib-0.34.tar.gz
http://www.pointer.co.il/~mulix/r2l/biditext-0.9.6.tar.gz
tiny releases, no reason to upgrade (until your name is tzafrir and you
are building the r2l-all package).
changes:
* imported to cvs (cvs server running on my machine, i c
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote:
> > i saw some other errors when compiling with gcc3.0. i'll make a patch
> > later.
>
> Are those errors or just warnings?
warnings, and none of them were in refreshd. i fixed the warnings in
r2llib and biditext (missing #include ).
in the plugins dir
10 matches
Mail list logo