Re: [LinPrj] slm

2001-12-27 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
Is this a side efect of the Turkish patch !?? ;- Emil On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Ahmet Olmez wrote: ### BU MESAJ BIR SPAM DEGILDIR# ## http://alisverissehri.kolayweb.com

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.1

2001-12-27 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
Hi Tzafrir On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote: Hi Tzafrir, There should be no problem regarding its compilation, however if you compile it don't remove that macro from refreshd_params.h refreshd will not run correctly. What I wanted to say here was that if you compile with the macro

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.4

2002-01-02 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
Hi Tzafrir, It seems that things got messed up somehow with the tarball. I downloaded r2l-0.9.4.tar.gz from http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/R2L/r2l-tarball/ and there are problems compiling it under Solaris. It seems that there is a problem with the following line in the configure script:

Re: [LinPrj] r2l-0.9.5

2002-01-10 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Kohn Emil Dan wrote: Hi Tzafrir, Played a little bit with the Solaris version. The old problem with the path to install-sh is still there. A short reminder of it: Aftyer running ./configure followedby