Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.1

2001-12-28 Thread guy keren
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > I'm generally quite satisfied with this one (even though I have some > problems when trying to build it on other platforms, mainly with > refreshd, I can live with that) > > So I'd like to hear some success stories, and then get 1.0 out. i am trying i

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.4

2002-01-02 Thread guy keren
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > i also noticed that you're not using the latest version of r2lgnomepapplet > > - which is more visually appealing then the current one, and also > > suppports the '--minimal' flag shlomi has requested. i'll send you its > > sources in the next email.

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.4

2002-01-02 Thread guy keren
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Just placed a new tarball/rpm there. Should fix at least most of the > prblems. Since it is in the same day, I decided not to bump the version > number... ok, seems to compile better now, althought since i still had a link to a dynamic-version of 'r2ll

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 1.0

2002-01-23 Thread guy keren
just add the minimal version of fribidi required - and it looks perfect to my unsuspecting eyes :) guy On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 02:20:10 +0200 (IST) > From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Haifux projects list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [L