Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.1

2001-12-28 Thread guy keren
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: I'm generally quite satisfied with this one (even though I have some problems when trying to build it on other platforms, mainly with refreshd, I can live with that) So I'd like to hear some success stories, and then get 1.0 out. i am trying it

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.1

2001-12-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote: Just an aside, make sure that on other (i.e. non-Linux) platforms the ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET_ADDRESSES macro is not defined in refreshd_params.h Regards,

Re: [LinPrj] r2l 0.9.1

2001-12-27 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
Hi Tzafrir On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote: Hi Tzafrir, There should be no problem regarding its compilation, however if you compile it don't remove that macro from refreshd_params.h refreshd will not run correctly. What I wanted to say here was that if you compile with the macro