On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
Hi All,
Purpose of this email is to debate on the pros and cons of having a
common
ARM context save/restore code.
Currently each SOC has its own way of
Hi,
Please find attached 3 patches for :
- enabling cpuidle feature on MOP500 hrefp
- making cpufreq stat available for powertop
- adding debugfs clock tree for powerdebug
These patches have been tested on the latest
//git.linaro.org/bsp/st-ericsson/linux-2.6.34-ux500
Vincent
From
On 10 Oct 11, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached 3 patches for :
- enabling cpuidle feature on MOP500 hrefp
- making cpufreq stat available for powertop
- adding debugfs clock tree for powerdebug
These patches have been tested on the latest
Yes I think this is well within the realm of the possible.
Regards
Tom
On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Robert Berger gm...@reliableembeddedsystems.com
wrote:
Hi,
I guess a major speedup could be achieved by not again partitioning the
SD card once it has been partitioned, but just copy over
Hi.
I have a Cortex A9 vexpress board and I've been trying some of the headless
daily builds as described here :
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/QA/TestCases/HeadlessVexpress.
The instructions are based around the MMC card with uboot, kernel and rootfs
all loaded via this interface.
I've had
On 10 Oct 11, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 11 October 2010 10:58, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10 Oct 11, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached 3 patches for :
- enabling cpuidle feature on MOP500 hrefp
- making cpufreq stat available for powertop
- adding
Can we merge the SD/MMC patches for i.MX MMC support into the linaro kernel?
They have been reviewed extensively and look very likely to go into the next
merge window.
Merging them and enabling SD support for i.MX51 will allow us to make a more
functional hwpack for the babbage boards.
Please
The following changes since commit d0bbdab2bb2c55c3dc6a4b3fd2128250dff99feb:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1006.12 (2010-09-20 20:01:02 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro-2.6.35-1007.13
Al Viro (2):
arm: fix really nasty
The following changes since commit b99670db3d6a43efe6d55ce92d7a227fb1ff41f7:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1006.11 (2010-09-16 17:17:17 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1007.12
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke the filesystem). It still takes
several minutes to get to a prompt as mentioned on the wiki page.
It happens
Hi Jamie,
On 10/11/2010 03:03 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke the filesystem). It still takes
several minutes to get to
Looks like discussion is still happening on the mmc mailing list wrt
those patches. How pressing is it to have them merged? I'd like to
pick up the final patch versions if possible.
Also I'd much prefer if someone could test those patches when applied to
the linaro stable tree before
I applied the patches on linux-linaro-2.6.35, and can mount the rootfs on mmc.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Nicolas Pitre
nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
Looks like discussion is still happening on the mmc mailing list wrt
those patches. How pressing is it to have them merged? I'd like
13 matches
Mail list logo
