Hi,
the third way is to go to the keyserver.ubuntu.com website, search for your
keyid and copy the key to a text file for import locally...
1. go to
http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xF1FCBACA7BE1F97B
2. copy the GPG block to a text file: key.txt
3. sudo apt-key add
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:27:21AM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:49:21PM +0530, Amit wrote:
I am not able to install any packages related to linaro for example
when I tried that below command
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:linaro-maintainers/toolchain
I
On 16 February 2012 18:14, viresh kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Catalin Marinas
catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
The DMA API implementation on ARM takes care of the cache cleaning and
invalidating.
I believe that this is the reason why we have cache
Hello,
Ok, this has been fixed now, sun-java6 packages are installed from
local mirror on android-build, building capability is restored.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android-infrastructure/+bug/936990 is
opened to track switching to OpenJDK, awaiting Android team response to
that.
Also,
Hello,
As the result of implementation of
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android-infrastructure/+spec/build-config-in-git
,
android-build.linaro.org now can indirectly fetch build config stored
in a git repository. To achieve that, bootstrap config (as specified
in
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
Linux platform where they can easily recompile what they need to hack
on, add their own libs
On 20 February 2012 16:42, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff.
Nano and then install the packages you actually need on top of that?
-- PMM
On 20 févr. 2012, at 08:42, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
Linux platform
We have the developer image. That's exactly it's purpose.
http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/linaro-o-developer/
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that
Hi Zach,
On 02/20/2012 09:42 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
Linux platform where they can easily
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
Linux
Hi
On 20 February 2012 08:42, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Of
course I said Android, but a lot of people actually want a regular
Linux platform
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:48:56AM -0800, viresh kumar wrote:
On Feb 20, 2012 4:31 PM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On 16 February 2012 18:14, viresh kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Catalin Marinas
catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
V, Aneesh ane...@ti.com wrote:
I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %function' is a problem
in the code, so it's not a critical bug. But I would've been happier if
the linker refused to link it rather than branching with the wrong
instruction. Isn't that a problem?
Well, if the
On Feb 20, 2012 11:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk
wrote:
I hope it's now clear why we need to run over the buffer twice.
Thanks Russell.
Got it now.
--
Viresh
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
On Feb 20, 2012 4:31 PM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On 16 February 2012 18:14, viresh kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Catalin Marinas
catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
The DMA API implementation on ARM takes care of the cache cleaning
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ Fathi Boudra [2012-02-20 09:34 -0800]:
Hi
On 20 February 2012 08:42, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than
nano and smaller than Ubuntu that
+++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does matter.
No, if you want to use buildroot, use buildroot (or openbricks, or
yocto, or OE). Debian/Ubuntu are
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
Would there be a buildroot like setup? Like Wookey mentioned size does
matter.
No, if you want to use
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:03 PM, C.A, Subramaniam
subramaniam...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ C.A, Subramaniam [2012-02-20 13:32 -0600]:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
Would there be a buildroot like
Paul,
Would you get Andrey setup to push to android.git.linaro.org?
We should name it
kernel/kwg.git
Sound good with everyone?
On 17 February 2012 12:16, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konova...@linaro.org wrote:
Greetings,
The tree is here:
Hi guys,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:29 PM, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I'm having trouble building the Thumb2 kernel on, I actually believe
this same code worked
Hi kukjin Kim,
I was on travel for elc and linaro conferences so little late for
replying. Thanks for testing these patches.
I just submitted the V6 series of the cpuidle patchset. I rebased it
against the 3.3-rc4 kernel version. I also tested it for SMDKV310
(evt1) and Origen (evt1.1) boards and
W dniu 21.02.2012 04:37, Matt Sealey pisze:
I'm kind of languishing in gcc 4.4 hell right now and would quite like
an updated toolchain for 4.6.2 or thereabouts (synced with the 2012.12
Linaro release). Is this available as a package or PPA somewhere or am
I going to spend the night
Hey,
As usual, here it goes the announcement of the 12.02 RC images. This
time it's later than usual because we had an issue with our builder
(offspring), but seems to be all solved now (thanks to Fathi).
This release includes a newer version of Unity (2d and 3d), XBMC and
for Pandaboard's
25 matches
Mail list logo
