Help for Foundation model

Hi all, Foundation model is closed source propertiary software, but i want to know how i can get more detailed and comprehensive technical support? I want to know the work procedure of boot wrapper. For example, make CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- BOOTARGS='root=/dev/vda2 consolelog=9 rw

Re: Help for Foundation model

Hi, On 21 May 2013 11:48, Wang Wei bessel.w...@huawei.com wrote: Hi all, Foundation model is closed source propertiary software, but i want to know how i can get more detailed and comprehensive technical support? I want to know the work procedure of boot wrapper. For example, make

Re: Help for Foundation model

On 21 May 2013 07:18, Wang Wei bessel.w...@huawei.com wrote: Hi all, Foundation model is closed source propertiary software, but i want to know how i can get more detailed and comprehensive technical support? It depends what support you want, but the Foundation Model is provided by ARM and

Unable to clone the Panda Kernel 3.2.0+ - Community user

Hello I tried to clone the panda kernel. But I get the below errors I ran the command: from /tmp/ folder on my Fedora FC15 machine, x86 git clone http://android.git.linaro.org/git-ro/kernel/panda pandakernel I am pasting the errors I received: git clone

Re: Unable to clone the Panda Kernel 3.2.0+ - Community user

On 21 May 2013 12:38, Denny G dennygeorg...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I tried to clone the panda kernel. But I get the below errors I ran the command: from /tmp/ folder on my Fedora FC15 machine, x86 git clone http://android.git.linaro.org/git-ro/kernel/panda pandakernel I am pasting the

Re: Hwpacks for OE builds?

On 20 May 2013 18:05, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote: See http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-481 We want to consolidate our approaches into a single approach that scales across distributions. so from the perspective of a Linaro user, or a customer who will care only about OE,

Re: Hwpacks for OE builds?

On 21 May 2013 10:50, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@linaro.org wrote: On 20 May 2013 18:05, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote: See http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-481 We want to consolidate our approaches into a single approach that scales across distributions. so from the

Re: Repo for Managing Git Repositories

On 21 May 2013 07:51, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote: Not trying to hijack the thread here but something like tinderboxes would be rather handy in terms of ensuring builds dont break http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinderbox_%28software%29 libreoffice uses them that way if

Patch merge request for STE Snowball build failure on linux-arm-soc-for-next.

Hi, There is a build failure for STE Snowball on linux-arm-soc-for-next branch in Linaro Kernel CI system: https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linux-arm-soc-for-next/hwpack=snowball,label=kernel_cloud/46/console which is caused by: 01:31:32

Re: Deadline scheduler inclusion in linux-linaro?

On 05/20/2013 02:37 PM, Ola Liljedahl wrote: Interesting. But SCHED_DEADLINE doesn't depend on the PREEMPT_RT modifications? Are these solutions overlapping in some areas? SCHED_DEADLINE does not depend on PREEMPT_RT. However, these two patchsets can coexist, and you'll have benefits from

Re: Deadline scheduler inclusion in linux-linaro?

Hi, On 05/17/2013 11:15 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: Juri has expressed an interest in maintaining a current branch of the code that could be merged into our monthly release. In return, real world usecases will improve his chances of getting the code merged into mainline. I just finished rebasing

Re: Patch merge request for STE Snowball build failure on linux-arm-soc-for-next.

Hi Botao, On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:34:52PM +1000, Botao Sun wrote: Hi, There is a build failure for STE Snowball on linux-arm-soc-for-next branch in Linaro Kernel CI system: https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linux-arm-soc-for-next/hwpack=snowball,label=kernel_cloud/46/console which

Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: arm_big_little: pass target residency to mcpm

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:39:38AM +0100, Sebastian Capella wrote: Hi Nico, Liviu, Catalin, Hi Sebastian, Do you expect there to also be cases where the PSCI interface may not be aware of all of the platform states? Not sure why the PSCI interface would have a say here. It's only an

Re: [GIT PULL]: ll-interactive-gov-updates : Per policy governor instance

Hi Viresh, On 05/21/2013 10:20 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi Andrey, I have got some important updates for Android's Interactive Governor. These are already sent to Todd Poyner for inclusion into AOSP and we are awaiting a response. These changes are important for ARM big LITTLE platforms which

Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 13.05 published

Greetings, On 05/20/2013 01:28 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule The 13.05 linux-linaro release will be v3.10-rc2 based May 20: ll rebuild based on llct-20130518.0 * Done: the tag is ll-20130520.1 * Changes: . Snowball

Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: arm_big_little: pass target residency to mcpm

Thanks Liviu! Some comments below.. Quoting Liviu Dudau (2013-05-21 10:15:42) ... Which side of the interface are you actually thinking of? Both, I'm really just trying to understand the problem. I don't think there is any C-state other than simple idle (which translates into an WFI for the

gator profiling

hi When i download the git.linaro.org/git-ro/landing-teams/working/arm/kernel.git, there are branches relates to gator. I set up the enviroment at TC2 with gator and Dstream. I want to show the CPU frequencies of big and little clusters, so i add code in gator to get the frequency of the clusters.