On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 10:51 +, Edward Nevill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how I do
>
> adrp x0, dest & ~0xfff
> add x0, x0, dest & 0xfff
>
> in aarch64 assembler?
Guessing here from experience with 32-bit ARM...
adr x0, dest
and the assembler with generate the
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:24 +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Lisa Nguyen lisa.ngu...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/functions.sh b/include/functions.sh
index 6d75e34..d44706f 100644
--- a/include/functions.sh
+++ b/include/functions.sh
@@ -285,10
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 14:59 +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:24 +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Lisa Nguyen lisa.ngu...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 12:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On 17 June 2014 12:18, Vishal Bhoj vishal.b...@linaro.org wrote:
On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote:
Vishal,
1. against which tree should it be applied?
I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:38 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On 17 June 2014 13:16, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 12:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
I've added him.
You didn't seem to have, unless this more of the Linaro's
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 21:12 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
On 6 August 2013 20:47, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:52AM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
6) warning-elimination: nobody uses cci_pmu_destroy
Presumably coming from the CCI stuff Tixy pulled in
I'll
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:45 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
2) I saw the vexpress integration stuff from ARM LT was included
already which is good, is there a wiki page (or README.html or the
gitweb is also good) explaining the composition?
The vexpress branch is basicall the same as what is in
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:43 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
On 5 August 2013 10:45, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Mark -
I have some small practical questions about LSK. I was able to make a
tree with our linux-linaro-core-tracking@v3.10 LT patches on LSK basis
work well (so
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
On 5 August 2013 16:58, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
tracking-armlt-cci
CCI driver and CCI PMU patches.
We started using that the other day trying to track down a nasty bug,
I didn't even know we got it from
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how
ongoing
updates
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote:
The vexpress defconfig has always been broken.
...maybe we could fix it?
It has been suggested that should be deleted as people can use the
multiplatform defconfig
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 19:56 +, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
Is there a written spec or description of how a boot program (u-boot, UEFI,
hypervisor) boots an OS on ARM platforms?
There's some information in the Linux source in the file
Documentation/arm/Booting.
--
Tixy
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 19:03 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
Hi,
With latest Linaro ARM kernel mentioned below fails to boot when
following configs are enabled
CONFIG_VEXPRESS_SPC CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_TC2_PM
OR
Even just enabling CONFIG_VEXPRESS_PSCI and passing psci as kernel
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:30 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 19:03 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
Hi,
With latest Linaro ARM kernel mentioned below fails to boot when
following configs are enabled
CONFIG_VEXPRESS_SPC CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_TC2_PM
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 14:41 +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
Hi,
There's a few warning that nobody noticed or cared until now:
[...]
Value requested for CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT not in final .config
Requested value: # CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT is not set
Actual value:
Value requested for CONFIG_MTD_CHAR
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 15:50 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
Hi,
On Arndale board, perf works well on llct as well as Samsung topic
tree[1], but fails on linux-linaro[2]. Git bisect points to commit
6fea652c638e ARM: perf: [WIP] Add register emulation for offline ARMv7
PMUs.
Is there anything
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:14 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Hi -
Something maybe unrelated after inserting gator successfully get
some kernel logs coming
[ 52.491528] CPU PMU: unable to set irq affinity (irq=0, cpu=0)
[ 52.496351] CPU PMU: unable to set irq affinity (irq=0, cpu=0)
...
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 20:29 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Hi -
If you have a CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM kernel, with big.LITTLE
configured but running on say, a CA9 system, and you have gator from
llct, and you insert gator
Looks like a bug I fixed a week ago...
() output
below I think you're even more behind the times than you thought ;-)
[1]
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/tracking-gator-llct-20130604.0
thanks for the fix.
-Andy
On 11 June 2013 21:04, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:30 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
No, unfortunately I am evidently ahead of the times ^^ -- your patch
does not fix my bug...
I have a valid DT table, it's just not on a SoC that has big.LITTLE.
mpidr_cpuids_count is 0 and nr_cpu_ids is 2 ...
Instead of using DT being
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 22:09 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Thanks. This and the similar issue with perf might be telling us a
global probed SoC capability flag for bL or-ed with the config being
there might be helpful.
Now we have accepted DT bindings for cpu nodes [1] perhaps all board's
with missing cpu nodes.
--
Tixy
-Andy
On 11 June 2013 22:34, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 22:09 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Thanks. This and the similar issue with perf might be telling us a
global probed SoC capability flag for bL or-ed with the config being
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 00:07 -0400, David Long wrote:
I'm trying to build for versatile express to run under QEMU. When I
boot under QEMU I get errors regarding the SD voltage, and it fails. I
have not really used QEMU for testing before. Has anyone encountered
this? It's likely I've got
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:10 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
Timely updates on llct for each mainline -rc are very interesting
though, in fact we depend on them.
+1.
Another +1 :-)
Well, it's timely updates to linux-linaro I'm most interested in, but
that implies regular llct updates as
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 13:19 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Guys,
Few of my ARM colleagues are facing issues in obtaining git tree for
13.03 release.
They are referring:
https://releases.linaro.org/13.03/android/vexpress
file: linaro_kernel_build_cmds.sh
Which has got following line
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 14 May 2013 18:49, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
This also enables CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1 which we didn't already have
enabled in our builds, so I assume nothing actually needs this option.
If that's true
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:12 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 15 May 2013 14:05, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
If the assembler version is always faster I would have thought that we
should always have it enabled and not have it as a user visible option.
Perhaps the fact
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:41 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 15 May 2013 14:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
I see that the ARM version is following the pattern of SPARC64 and X86
SSSE3 in how it is configured, so for fear of opening a can of worms,
perhaps it's simpler if we
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 09:49 -0700, Sebastian Capella wrote:
Thanks Daniel!
Liviu,
I have been using on the linux-linaro branch in the linux-linaro-tracking
repository here:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-linaro
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 14:16 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
These assembler implementations of SHA1 and AES have been
in the upstream source tree since September 2012 but need
to be selected explicitly in order to be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
---
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Greetings,
This wiki page:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule
- is now tracking the linux-linaro kernel rebuilds for 13.05.
v3.9 release based linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) rebuild has
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 08:06 -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
Hi Xiaoke,
On 05/03/2013 05:08 AM, Wang Wei wrote:
Dear linaro members
I want to build arm64 kernel according to the steps of
HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel. Then i use Foundatin_v8 with args such as
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 06:21 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Doesnt email run the risk of a patch slipping through the cracks?
And with gerrit the patch author needs to get an account enabled with
the project, produce a git commit against the current tip, know who to
pick as reviewers then rely
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 12:48:28 Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
index 8d1e2bb..73a99e4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 16:28 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
On 04/16/2013 09:46 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 16/04/13 10:08, the mail apparently from Selina Kuo included:
Hi, John,
Your assumption is right. The ump code is part of the out-of-tree mali
driver.
- Selina Kuo, one of Andy's
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:16 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
On 16/04/13 10:08, the mail apparently from Selina Kuo included:
Hi, John,
Your assumption is right. The ump code is part of the out-of-tree mali
driver.
- Selina Kuo, one of Andy's colleagues ^^
As Selina says it's a code
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 16:08 +, Young, Chad wrote:
Hello
I am looking for the kernel source 3.5.0-rc7 for the ARM versatile express
system, does anyone know where I can find it?
The best thing I can suggest is to look at the Linaro kernel tree [1]
looking for a tag in the form 'll-*'
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 11:27 -0800, D D wrote:
Yes, I have tried both the config in the release notes as well as
configurations to boot A7.
The configurations to boot A7 hang while executing the BOOTSCRIPT.
The release note configurations get past that state, boot up the
kernel and hang as
After some time investigating why I wasn't seeing some kernel section
mismatch errors that someone else was seeing, I found the cause was that
in Linaro we build Thumb2 kernels in the main, and modpost.c doesn't
have support for any of the Thumb relocation types in addend_arm_rel().
I thought I
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:28 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
After some time investigating why I wasn't seeing some kernel section
mismatch errors that someone else was seeing, I found the cause was that
in Linaro we build Thumb2 kernels
I've added the linaro-dev list to the cc as I think my answer is useful
for everyone working with Linaro's kernels...
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:54 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On Feb 19, 2013 8:50 PM, Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggem...@arm.com
wrote:
there're a couple of config switches for
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 10:33 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 17:16 +, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Tixy,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:07:43PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
The function
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 14:37 +, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
dropped linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
On 15/02/13 12:06, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 10:33 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 15:13 +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
On 01/29/2013 06:26 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
What I suspect is that the configuration in SITE1/HBI0249A/board.txt
isn't right, particularly the value for SCC 0x700. We are currently
putting the files and instructions together
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 14:32 +0800, Chao Xie wrote:
hi
I have seen in the arm website that arm release the VE 5.0. THere is a
patch named CPU Migration Patch for version 5.0 for cpu migration.
Now i have downloaded the source code from
This is needed so the file is given executable permissions when it is
placed in the initrd. (Android doesn't use the file's attributes when
creating filesystems, instead it applies the set of rules in
system/core/include/private/android_filesystem_config.h)
This fixes bug:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 16:04 +, Punit Agrawal wrote:
I am not quite sure where to send this patch to get it included in Linaro.
But
you seem to have a few patches in this repo, so maybe you can apply this
one.
Yes, I can do that. It looks like it copes OK for devices without any
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 12:10 +, Punit Agrawal wrote:
This patch fixes incorrect range check for the number of PMU counters. This
caused the number of counters to be off-by-1.
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal punit.agra...@arm.com
---
Hi Tixy,
I discovered an embarassing range check issue
Subject:[PATCH] vexpress: Setup IRQ affinity to A7s for TC2
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:20:19 +
From: Punit Agrawal punit.agra...@arm.commailto:punit.agra...@arm.com
To: t...@linaro.orgmailto:t...@linaro.org
t...@linaro.orgmailto:t...@linaro.org
CC:
Patch 25c92a37a (arm64: Always select ARM_AMBA and GENERIC_GPIO)
expects platforms to have GPIO so we need to make sure vexpress
always has this by selecting ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB.
Without this change drivers like MMC fail to compile due to missing
gpio definitions like:
In file included from
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 13:59 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 7 January 2013 13:47, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:23:48PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Does anyone have any further outstanding concerns or comments about my
proposed patch?
Since
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 13:47 +, Dave Martin wrote:
(Minor point: you can merge the b start with the first entry of
the vectors, because this slot is never used for any other purpose in
any vector table. The code works anyway, though.)
I considered that when I wrote the patch but thought I
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 14:06 -0800, John Stultz wrote:
Ok, I've got a first-pass branch here:
git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git
linaro-android-3.8-jstultz-test
Thanks for that.
Instead of doing the full re-base, I just merged the 3.8-rc2+ tree into
the
Hi All
I assume we'll be moving to Linux 3.8 for the January release cycle?
For my part I have prepared a 3.8 branch for vexpress [1] which doesn't
yet contain Android patches or bit.LITTLE MP as their respective
branches aren't on 3.8 yet.
[1]
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 15:14 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 4 January 2013 15:09, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
I assume we'll be moving to Linux 3.8 for the January release cycle?
For my part I have prepared a 3.8 branch for vexpress [1] which doesn't
yet contain Android
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 18:33 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
I take it as the vexpress topic (for the ll tree) and the big.LITTLE
topic (for the llct tree) are ready to switch to 3.8, correct?
Yes for the vexpress topic assuming big.LITTLE and Android topics move
to 3.8.
--
Tixy
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:54 +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:10 -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 13:52 -0800, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Friday, December 7, 2012
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 13:52 -0800, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Friday, December 7, 2012, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
To enable CPU hotplug the need to provide some boot code at the
reset
vector and which survives after the kernel has booted without being
overwritten. We achieve
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:10 -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 13:52 -0800, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Friday, December 7, 2012, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
To enable CPU hotplug the need
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:00 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 14/12/12 15:54, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:10 -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 13:52 -0800, Christoffer Dall
Adding some named people to the 'To' list to try and elicit review
comments... :-)
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 11:35 +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
To enable CPU hotplug the need to provide some boot code at the reset
vector and which survives after the kernel has booted without being
overwritten
To enable CPU hotplug the need to provide some boot code at the reset
vector and which survives after the kernel has booted without being
overwritten. We achieve this by the getting the linker script to place
the code in boot.S at address zero. This now means we can delete the
code that relocates
Both the Android and Ubuntu have QA tests which expect to be able to
validate device-tree booting by looking in /proc/device-tree, so we
should enable this for all Linaro builds.
At the same time we can remove this option from ubuntu.conf as it's not
an Ubuntu specific requirement.
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:18 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 3 December 2012 20:23, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
We boot the kernel in non-secure mode and by default access to
the CCI device is not enabled for non-secure access, so we must
enable this if we want Linux to manage
We boot the kernel in non-secure mode and by default access to
the CCI device is not enabled for non-secure access, so we must
enable this if we want Linux to manage CPU hotplug on big.LITTLE
models.
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst t...@linaro.org
---
semi_loader.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2
We boot the kernel in non-secure mode and by default access to
the CCI device is not enabled for non-secure access, so we must
enable this if we want Linux to manage CPU hotplug on big.LITTLE
models.
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst t...@linaro.org
---
Changes since V1:
- Add a DSB instructions
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 29 November 2012 21:43, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
Linaro's kernel tree already has an interactive governor which is
provided by the Android topic branch, so isn't trying to integrate
another version going to cause
From: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
We need to set the flags when checking the feature register.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
---
I found this patch in another fork of the bootwrapper and it looks like
something we should have. On the A15 and big.LITTLE setups I've tested
it
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 20:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Andrey,
This is more of announcement than a PULL request. :)
Most of us are working with interactive governor. But most of us use
a different version of it, as it is not yet mainlined and there is no hope
of it getting mainlined.
When the generic ftrace implementation modifies code for trace-points it
uses stop_machine() to call ftrace_modify_all_code() on one CPU. This
ultimately calls the ARM specific function ftrace_modify_code() which
updates the instruction and then does flush_icache_range(). As this
cache flushing
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 19 November 2012 22:44, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konova...@linaro.org
wrote:
I won't pull the big-LITTLE-MP-master-v12 into the
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree today due to the issues found by Tixy.
Tomorrow evening I am going to
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 10:23 +, Chris Redpath wrote:
Well, I didn't find any problem with USB boot. I'm just setting up u-boot to
go for a completely standard MMC boot and I'll continue to try to reproduce.
I use ARM's bootmonitor for booting. My setup should have the same
firmware and boot
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 11:31 +, Chris Redpath wrote:
Hi Tixy,
It seems that at least on my board, the presence of so many MMC timeouts
causes the A7s to remain at the lowest frequency, presumably because the
system load average is so low. With the frequency-invariant patch, this has
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 11:32 +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Tixy, could you try temporarily changing the default option to off for the
frequency-invariant load?
I think it'll be at line 3631 in your fair.c
hmp_data.freqinvar_load_scale_enabled = 1;
Change it to 0
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:39 +, Chris Redpath wrote:
Hi Tixy,
I can now reproduce it with MMC too, and the times are pretty much the same
for me :(
There is definitely some interaction with CPUFreq, the A7s stay at a low
enough OPP
that the busy threads during boot are never able to
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 10:40 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Please pull big-LITTLE-MP-master-v12 with following updates:
- Based on v3.7-rc5
- Stats:
- Total Patches: 62
- New Patches: 1
- genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option in
different configs to see if I can narrow the slowness
down.
--
Tixy
Best Regards,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [mailto:t...@linaro.org]
Sent: 19 November 2012 15:41
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Andrey Konovalov; PDSW-power-team; Lists linaro-dev
Subject: Re
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 21:14 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Viresh,
I won't pull the big-LITTLE-MP-master-v12 into the
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree today due to the issues found by Tixy.
Tomorrow evening I am going to pull this topic anyway - whether these
issues are resolved, or not.
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 22:24 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 11/19/2012 10:17 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 21:14 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Viresh,
I won't pull the big-LITTLE-MP-master-v12 into the
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree today due to the issues
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 09:11 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
Of course, this can't be done until Linaro's CI jobs and Ubuntu kernel
packaging jobs support multiple config fragments, so for now we're stuck
with one config per board. Shall we agree that all of these will live in
the central
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
Now that the LT branches included in linux-linaro (ll) are based on
llct, then they could modify the board configs
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 11:37 +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
Now that the LT branches included in linux-linaro
Adding linaro-dev list and replying with some comments...
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 20:20 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
The llct tree itself has no suitable .conf or defconfig for vexpress at
all. That's the problem (wrt the ci jobs).
The easier way seemed to be a single kernel/configs.git,
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config
fragments fully, then we could have have separate config fragments for
- basic board config
- new board enablement
Not sure if I follow this 100%... Can I
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:30 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config
fragments fully, then we could have have separate
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:32 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12 November 2012 22:27, Punit Agrawal punit.agra...@arm.com wrote:
I am attaching a patch by Thomas Gleixner which adds a kernel
command line parameter to set the defauilt IRQ affinity mask. Could
you please integrate this in your
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 00:10 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
* November 6: updated big-LITTLE-MP topic arrives, llct rebuild
(llct-20121106)
Done. The tag is llct-20121106.0. v3.7-rc4 based.
Android and big-LITTLE-MP topics are back. New Gator version (v5.12).
*ubuntu-sauce topic will
Hi Andrey
Two weeks ago ARM released a new version of Developer Studio 5 (v5.12)
which as usual included a new version of the Streamline plugin and the
corresponding new versions of the Gator daemon and module which run on
the target device.
I have updated my tracking branch which is pulled into
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 22:56 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
I
still recommend to read the following pages to get familiar with this
beast:
https://wiki.linaro.org/PawelMoll/BootingVEMadeEasy
snip
https://wiki.linaro.org/ARM/VersatileExpressSetup
This page shows how to install U-Boot on
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:18 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
Monday of the week before
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:46 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Please PULL b.L MP V10 branch from my tree.
I've been testing with the v10 branch and with Enable HMP priority
filter by default I have get a crash in select_task_rq_fair() on
vexpress A9, busy investigating this at the
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
domain (which is probably a good thing anyway)
Oops, my last patch included some extra junk, the one attached to this
mail fixes this...
From
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 19:11 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12 October 2012 19:03, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
domain (which is probably a good
(Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
domain (which is probably a good thing anyway)
Oops, my last patch included some extra junk, the one attached to this
mail fixes
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 21:03 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12 October 2012 20:41, Morten Rasmussen morten.rasmus...@arm.com wrote:
Thanks for the patch. I think this patch is the right way to solve this
issue.
There is still a problem with the priority filter in
hmp_down_migration()
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 12:45 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 12:34 +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 9 October 2012 16:24, Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 11:42 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
Robin raised a valid point that this driver is TC2
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 12:04 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
Hi Tixy,
Could you have a look at my code stealing patch below? Since it is
basically a trimmed version of one of your patches I would prefer to
put you as author and have your SOB on it. What is your opinion?
Yes, I can agree with
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 09:27 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
On 09/10/12 08:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Following is the declaration of name field in struct cpufreq_driver:
char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
where CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN is 16.
So, length of drivers name must be =15 (one position
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 11:42 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
On 09/10/12 11:33, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 09:27 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
On 09/10/12 08:10, Viresh Kumar wrote
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:15 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 9 October 2012 21:02, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
Considering the confusion over what the correct naming should be, I
don't think it's worth me apply the renaming patch at the moment ;-)
This thread went into another
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
