On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:37 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 09/13/2010 12:31 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven
> >
> > PowerTOP wants to be able to show the user how effective the ALPM link
> > power management is for the user. ALPM is worth around 0.5W on a quiet
> > link;
On 10 Sep 14, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> >
> > Yong Shen - is this patch faithful to the version released by Arjan?
>
> This looks like a modified verison of the patch which Arjan submitted
> upstream a while back, ie Nov 2009:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/43337
>
> Has there been
Hi there,
Well, I did not modify the content of the patch. It can be 'git am' on
ubuntu kernel without conflict.
This patch is directly from git://git.linaro.org/amitarora/powertop.git
commit cc1aaff10ee9046b835441d295fda498f68cb1ac
Author: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Jul 12 17:25:49 2010 -0400
On 09/13/2010 12:31 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven
>
> PowerTOP wants to be able to show the user how effective the ALPM link
> power management is for the user. ALPM is worth around 0.5W on a quiet
> link; PowerTOP wants to be able to find cases where the "quiet link" isn
From: Arjan van de Ven
PowerTOP wants to be able to show the user how effective the ALPM link
power management is for the user. ALPM is worth around 0.5W on a quiet
link; PowerTOP wants to be able to find cases where the "quiet link" isn't
actually quiet.
This patch adds state accounting functio
