On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:44:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > Right now it merges cleanly with linux-next and the resulting tree
>> > builds and boots at least on qemu. Unless yo
Hi Grant,
On Wed, 11 May 2011 22:44:49 +0200 Grant Likely
wrote:
>
> Right now it merges cleanly with linux-next and the resulting tree
> builds and boots at least on qemu. Unless you really object, I'm
> going to ask Stephen to add the following branch to the /end/ of the
> list of trees for l
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:44:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Right now it merges cleanly with linux-next and the resulting tree
> > builds and boots at least on qemu. Unless you really object, I'm
> > going to ask Stephen to add the foll
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:44:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote:
> Right now it merges cleanly with linux-next and the resulting tree
> builds and boots at least on qemu. Unless you really object, I'm
> going to ask Stephen to add the following branch to the /end/ of the
> list of trees for linux-nex
Hi Russell,
Here's the current state of the device tree patches for basic
infrastructure support. It's pretty much the same as the last series
I sent to you, except I've dropped the patches that add .dts files and
board support simply because the final location for storing .dtb files
is still up
