On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can
emulate it without worrying about guest support.
At this point x86 virtualization is mature
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 January 2013 14:55, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
possible guest OSes
Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org writes:
Hi All,
How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
desktop ?
I know folks have already thought about this and probably also tried
something or other on this front but, it will be good to know the downsides.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 24.01.2013, at 10:25, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
possible guest OSes can have support for
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi All,
How about having a generic
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi All,
How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
desktop ?
I have
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:12:20AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel
On 27.01.2013, at 15:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org writes:
Hi All,
How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
desktop ?
I know folks have already thought about this and probably also tried
something or other on this front
On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi All,
How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
desktop ?
I have also thought about this, current virtio design is not very
clean. On the
On 24 January 2013 14:55, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can
emulate it without
On 24.01.2013, at 10:25, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can
emulate it without worrying about guest
On 24 January 2013 14:38, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
But check out the QEMU e500 machine. We have a fully device tree
based machine type in the kernel. QEMU drives it by generating a
device tree for devices it actually exposes on the fly.
The ARM equivalent for that would be
On 24/01/13 14:52, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.01.2013, at 15:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
...do we have an ARM PCI controller of any working kind in
the kernel? versatilepb's PCI controller doesn't count as
it is utterly broken :-)
Don't the Marvell chips have PCI? And Tegra? I'm sure there
Hi All,
How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
desktop ?
I know folks have already thought about this and probably also tried
something or other on this front but, it will be good to know the downsides.
Virtio-desktop can be a separate specification describing a
14 matches
Mail list logo
