Hey Ricardo,
On 06/26/2012 05:30 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
Hey Andrey,
While looking on publishing the kernel packages for Ubuntu based on
llt, we noticed that it's unable to build in case CPU_IDLE is enabled.
This is basically because it seems one patch is applied twice, and
both adding
This is done. llt-20120626.0 should be ok (build tested with CPU_IDLE
enabled).
BTW, compared to the previous llt-20120613.0, llt-20120626.0 has vexpress
support, and (as a side effect of adding vexpress) gator upgraded from
5.10.0 to 5.10.1.
I will add an llt-vexpress-3.4 kernel variant
On 06/26/2012 06:51 PM, John Rigby wrote:
This is done. llt-20120626.0 should be ok (build tested with CPU_IDLE
enabled).
BTW, compared to the previous llt-20120613.0, llt-20120626.0 has vexpress
support, and (as a side effect of adding vexpress) gator upgraded from
5.10.0 to 5.10.1.
I
Hey Andrey,
While looking on publishing the kernel packages for Ubuntu based on
llt, we noticed that it's unable to build in case CPU_IDLE is enabled.
This is basically because it seems one patch is applied twice, and
both adding the same content at the cpuidle.h file:
$ git blame drivers
Amit/Mounir,
What's your guys plan with cpu_idle for each board? Are you going to
try and upstream a solution that will work across all boards? Would
you or Mounir be open to filing a BP per board so we can track when
cpu_idle will hit each board? Does it make sense to prototype
something across
