Dear Tom,
With respect to your nice investigation report on Libjpeg-turbo Vs Libjpeg8c, I
have a query on Libjpeg8c's tjbench
https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/LibJpeg8
When i took the Libjpeg8c source code from the Libjpeg community, I did not
find the tjbench support in the libjpeg8c
On 27 October 2011 12:38, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I doubt that Ubuntu will reconsider this for Precise, but I see that you did
schedule a session for UDS/Connect [1]. It would be good, if you could provide
relevant information for the session:
- performance data from your wiki
Here's one way that NEON could be employed to accelerate Huffman
decoding. The most common 32 symbols typically account for over 99%
of Huffman codes in a JPEG image, and are typically encoded with
codons of length 2-10 bits. Four 128-bit registers can hold these 32
codons as left-justified
On 10/26/2011 10:54 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
In prep for Linaro Connect the Ubuntu Developers Summit next week
I've put together some performance measurements comparing libjpeg8c
and libjpeg-turbo compiled with it's libjpeg8 compatibility setting.
Quality settings of 95 and 75 are used. Image
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:30:14PM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:54:52PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Hardware used includes the imx53 QuickStart board by freescale and an
intel core 2
In prep for Linaro Connect the Ubuntu Developers Summit next week
I've put together some performance measurements comparing libjpeg8c
and libjpeg-turbo compiled with it's libjpeg8 compatibility setting.
Quality settings of 95 and 75 are used. Image sizes used are 640x480
and 3136x2352.
Hardware
