Re: [ACTIVITY] 28 September-2 October 2015

2015-10-02 Thread Pinski, Andrew
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Christophe Lyon > wrote: > > == Progress == > 2 days off (4/10) > > * Infrastructure/validation: (3/10) > further checking of cross-testing results stability on aarch64-linux > - found a workaround for a timestamp problem (_Pragma3

[ACTIVITY] 28 September-2 October 2015

2015-10-02 Thread Christophe Lyon
== Progress == 2 days off (4/10) * Infrastructure/validation: (3/10) further checking of cross-testing results stability on aarch64-linux - found a workaround for a timestamp problem (_Pragma3 testcase) - looked at c11-atomic-exec-5 whose execution time ranges between 1s and 1h :-) -

[ACTIVITY] 28 September-2 October 2015

2015-10-02 Thread Yao Qi
# Progress # * TCWG-373, Aarch64 non-stop debugging (or displaced stepping). [2/10] Patches V1 are ready for upstream submission, but find opcodes has already interfaces to decode instructions, so decide to use opcodes for aarch64 GDB first. * TCWG-387, one patch exposing one opcode

Re: [ACTIVITY] 28 September-2 October 2015

2015-10-02 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 2 October 2015 at 18:04, Pinski, Andrew wrote: > > >> On Oct 2, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Christophe Lyon >> wrote: >> >> == Progress == >> 2 days off (4/10) >> >> * Infrastructure/validation: (3/10) >> further checking of cross-testing