RE: ILP32 toolchain status update

> Where such a decision was discussed? This was discussed back in the end of June. Mark Hambleton of ARM sent a response to Cavium to that effect. -Original Message- From: Maxim Kuvyrkov [mailto:maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:32 PM To: Pinski, Andrew

RE: ILP32 toolchain status update

I thought the decision Linaro/Arm was going to take over the development of the ILP32? What happened to that decision? Thanks, Andrew -Original Message- From: Yao Qi [mailto:yao...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:50 AM To: Pinski, Andrew Cc:

Re: [FYI] HCQC(HPC compiler quality checker) on GitHub

Hi, I am sorry for the inconvenience. #I'm not sure what is going on. #I can extract PDF from my first e-mail.!? Anyway, I will attach the PDF file to this mail and resend it. If this does not work, please let me know. I will put the file somewhere else. Best regards, --

RE: ILP32 toolchain status update

What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthread_db. Anyways I did not see some of those failures listed below when using the correct setup. -Original Message- From: Yao Qi

Linux kernel compiling with LTO

Hi Maxim, all, Alex Matveev and I try to enable LTO optimization for Linux kernel on ARM64. The work is based on patches from Andi Kleen, and is not complete yet. Maxim recommended to work tightly with toolchain group to understand how to fix problems better - on kernel or compiler side. Links: