Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-03-10 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Alex Bennée wrote: Not sure there's much point looking very deeply into this. Java programs are threaded, threaded programs don't work under QEMU = don't try to run Java under QEMU :-) Having said that I'm sure there was another SIGILL related crash on

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-02-27 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Dann Frazier wrote: I've narrowed down the changes that seem to prevent both types of segfaults to the following changes that introduce a wrapper around sigprocmask: https://github.com/susematz/qemu/commit/f1542ae9fe10d5a241fc2624ecaef5f0948e3472

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Andreas Färber wrote: There are some pretty large differences between these trees with respect to signal syscalls - is that the likely culprit? Quite likely. We explicitly concentrated on the arch64 specific instruction emulation leaving more generic patches

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Peter Maydell wrote: On 25 February 2014 13:33, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote The biggest road-block is that signal vs syscall handling is fundamentally broken in linux-user and it's unfixable without assembler implementations of the syscall caller. I'm