On 7 March 2012 09:39, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi
Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1].
Hello,
My name is Jiandong Zheng and am working on a few ARM specific projects.
I have been using Linaro toolchain coming with Ubuntu to do Cortext-A9
building. I also need to maintain code for old ARM11 SoC so that Linaro
toolchain is my preference and it did the job well back in Maverick
Hi,
Here is a new wiki page for benchmarking with cbuild. I separated it into
one part describing how to use the autobuilders, and one part for setting
stuff up manually, for instance for running on the ursas.
*
*
On Wed 07 Mar 2012 04:30:55 GMT, ezjd wrote:
Hello,
My name is Jiandong Zheng and am working on a few ARM specific
projects. I have been using Linaro toolchain coming with Ubuntu to do
Cortext-A9 building. I also need to maintain code for old ARM11 SoC so
that Linaro toolchain is my
Hi Michael,
A new bug triaging question.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppl/+bug/941676
This one is special too because the failure is on powerpc.
This means, I cannot reproduce it easily, and scan through the toolchains
(without building).
Matthias has given some information and a
Hi Michael,
Spec2000 is now running successfully: there are results at
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114965/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild257-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1/spec2000-o3-neon-run.txt
However, they seem to have been run in 'train' mode, and none of the
runs are long
On 03/07/2012 05:45 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Sorry, but no, the *binary* toolchains are configured for ARMv7, and
even if you pass the -march=armv6 flag that doesn't change the
configuration of libgcc and the other precompiled bit-and-bobs that
get linked in.
If you build your own compiler
On 02/27/2012 10:12 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
Hi Ken, Thiago. Could you try your hand at writing cards for the
OpenEmbedded Core meta-layer and GDB and Android? Here are some past
cards:
https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-GCC-O3
https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-OPENOCD-SUPPORT
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Zhenqiang Chen
zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 March 2012 09:39, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze:
I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
like X11/Xlib.h).
Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing.
BTW: which sysroot
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:00 AM, ezjd entropy@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/07/2012 05:45 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Sorry, but no, the *binary* toolchains are configured for ARMv7, and even if
you pass the -march=armv6 flag that doesn't change the configuration of
libgcc and the other precompiled
On 7 March 2012 17:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze:
I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
like X11/Xlib.h).
Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing.
BTW: which sysroot you are
In some ways it should. The binary toolchain has the multiarch
patches and should use the same search path. Should the sysroot
contain libgcc and libstdc++ at all?
The sysroot contain libgcc and libstdc++. But they are not in the
search path. In the sysroot, they are at:
On 7 March 2012 23:47, Ken Werner ken.wer...@linaro.org wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:26 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
Hi Ken. In follow up to our 1-on-1 yesterday, here's what I'd like done
next.
The goal is to use OE Core as a release test suite. The releases are
tarballs so we can keep the current
14 matches
Mail list logo
