W dniu 06.04.2012 17:01, Andy Doan pisze:
> I noticed today while looking at a merge proposal that we store some
> test data files for LAVA on the wiki[1]. I'm sure that was chosen
> because it works and its easy to manage. However, I'm not a huge fan of
> this for a few reasons:
>
> * easy to de
On 6 April 2012 18:43, Spring Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 6 April 2012 23:01, Andy Doan wrote:
>>
>> I noticed today while looking at a merge proposal that we store some test
>> data files for LAVA on the wiki[1]. I'm sure that was chosen because it
>> works and its easy to manage. However, I'm not a h
On 6 April 2012 23:01, Andy Doan wrote:
> I noticed today while looking at a merge proposal that we store some test
> data files for LAVA on the wiki[1]. I'm sure that was chosen because it
> works and its easy to manage. However, I'm not a huge fan of this for a few
> reasons:
>
> * easy to del
I noticed today while looking at a merge proposal that we store some
test data files for LAVA on the wiki[1]. I'm sure that was chosen
because it works and its easy to manage. However, I'm not a huge fan of
this for a few reasons:
* easy to delete an attachment
* Moin provides no revision co
On 04/06/2012 08:11 AM, YongQin Liu wrote:
Hi, Andy
In the attached tjbench.tgz file, there are two files:
tjbench_job.json
tjbench_result.json
tjbench_job.json is the job file I used, I defined 7 tjbench actions in
that file.
and tjbench_result.json is the result of the job, I use
l
