On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Markus Grabner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012, 21:18:11 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> The Kconfig entry notes that doing the impulse response test inside
>> the kernel avoids buffering/latency issues but it's not clear to me
>> that this code really needs
Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012, 21:18:11 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> I noticed the qtbased svn branch has a userspace signal generator
> tool. Does this mean we can drop the impulse response test in the
> driver?
No, the signal generator is not related to the impulse response feature.
> The Kcon
I noticed the qtbased svn branch has a userspace signal generator
tool. Does this mean we can drop the impulse response test in the
driver?
The Kconfig entry notes that doing the impulse response test inside
the kernel avoids buffering/latency issues but it's not clear to me
that this code really
