RE: lingo-l Dir -- Flash communication (static)

2005-09-20 Thread Sean Wilson
Actually, I really, really like the static attribute and hope it may find its way into lingo at some point. It already has to a degree - certainly as far as propertes, if not methods. See http://www.lingoworkshop.com/Articles/iloop.php?a=220 Cheers, -Sean. [To remove yourself from this

Re[3]: lingo-l Dir -- Flash communication (static)

2005-09-20 Thread Duck
Monday, September 19, 2005, 11:47:17 PM, Michael wrote: MM Actually, I really, really like the MM static attribute and hope it may find its way into lingo at some point. Are you aware that you can set and get the properties of a script object? - that is, the properties of an uninstantiated

lingo-l Out of Office

2005-09-20 Thread mcollins
I'll be out of the office until Sept 22, 2005. Please address all questions to Jennifer Tan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You Michael Collins Senior Project Manager Hyperdisk Media, Inc [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To

RE: Re[3]: lingo-l Dir -- Flash communication (static)

2005-09-20 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Seems very interesting, but can you change the value of a prop of an uninstantiated script? So for example, instances of a script can each refer to 'me.script.propertyName', and they all therefore have access to that same property, essentially a 'static variable'-esque property. [To remove

RE: Re[3]: lingo-l Dir -- Flash communication (static)

2005-09-20 Thread Cole Tierney
Seems very interesting, but can you change the value of a prop of an uninstantiated script? Yes you can. Hear's some more info: http://director-online.com/dougwiki/index.php/Static_Scripts -- Cole [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to

Re[5]: lingo-l Dir -- Flash communication (static)

2005-09-20 Thread Duck
Tuesday, September 20, 2005, 2:42:48 PM, Michael wrote: MM Seems very interesting, but can you change the value of a prop of an MM uninstantiated script? Yes - that's how the counter works in my shared counter example. Each instance of the script increments the counter property on the