Hi Tood,
I recall there being a problem with MX 2004 and sorenson 3 (a
macromedia technote) but I've used it all the way from dir version 6.5
- 9 without any problems. - apart from forcing people to install qt of
course.
There are problems with some later versions of quicktime so one thing
Hi list,
I have some huge text members that I've implemented a search using preg
xtra. Now I need to hilite the search result and when the user click next
button the text will scroll to the position of the other result and so on,
something like web browsers do.
Does anyone can help?
Thank's in
hi Rodrigo,
text members have the #scrolltop prop which you can set to scroll the
member
benjamin ;)
Rods schrieb:
Hi list,
I have some huge text members that I've implemented a search using preg
xtra. Now I need to hilite the search result and when the user click next
button the text will
Hi,
Anyone know how I can use things like getNettext when the computer uses
a proxy server to access the internet.
Do I need to use a 3rd party xtra like UltimateNetXtra, or is there a
way with just normal director lingo (MX 04)
Thanks
Tim
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to
I've found that you can't use dynamic paths, as you normally would with
Flash. You have to feed it the full file path. Here's what I use:
--
on mSetCommunicatorPath me
rootPath = the moviePath
if (the platform contains win) then
repeat while offset(\, rootPath) 0
On 23/11/05 12:51 pm, Rods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some huge text members that I've implemented a search using preg
xtra. Now I need to hilite the search result and when the user click next
button the text will scroll to the position of the other result and so on,
something like web
Wednesday, November 23, 2005, 2:08:58 PM, Tim wrote:
TW Hi,
TW Anyone know how I can use things like getNettext when the computer uses
TW a proxy server to access the internet.
TW Do I need to use a 3rd party xtra like UltimateNetXtra, or is there a
TW way with just normal director lingo (MX
hi tim,
look up
proxyServer(serverType, ipAddress, portNum)
in the help.
you can either get the proxy server's IP from the registry (pc,
require's some (free) xtra; on the mac there is propably some comand to
use with shell xtra), or let the user specify it manually.
valentin
Tim
Thanks for that Valentin, Duck,
I actually stumbled across the proxyserver function after my post,
But looks like a client requires user\pass authentication on the proxy
server as well, so may need the xtra Duck suggested, although I also
found UntimateNetXtra as well which seems to be a better
Hi Tim,
If you are in the following situation, NetLingo won't do the job (it'll
do otherwise):
- You want or have to support access through proxy server that requires
authentication.
- You don't have access to the proxy server address and/or don't want to
impose your user to enter this
Basic realm authentication should work. Just send your
username:password as a base64 encoded string as an Authorization:
Basic header. Guess that's why called basic authentication. :)
--
Cole
At 5:45 PM +0100 11/23/05, Valentin Schmidt wrote:
I wonder if (depending on the authorization
Good work, Tom! Eat some turkey, have a nap, then regroup. Thanks for
sharing that link, Darrel.
At 9:47 AM -0800 11/23/05, Darrel Plant wrote:
I don't know. It sounds like coverage of the race was pretty
positive. 25% of the vote when you got outspent over 10:1? That's a
good thing.
I don't think you can. The way the authentication is handled,
independantly from the authentication scheme is, that way:
- prerequisite : any access to an http resource throug a proxy that
require authentication has to be done with the Keep connection alive
flag set on.
- The client issues first a
Well, as Tom and some others know, I'm another Director developer who's
run (although not as seriously as Tom) for a state legislative seat. In
1994 I got about 23% of the vote in a primary for the Oregon House where
I was outspent 20:1. The district is about 70% Democratic, and whoever
wins
thanks cole, laurent for your replies.
laurent, what part of the process that you described do you think
wouldn't be possible to implement with multiuser lingo? If I understood
you correctly, this doesn't sound very difficult, as long as the whole
communication is text based, not binary (what
Propably I'm the only one interested in this :-)
But anyway, I've checked it out, it's really very easy to do this for
basic authentication. You only have to add one more HTTP-header line:
Proxy-Authorization Basic YWRtaW46Zm9v
where YWRtaW46Zm9v is a base64 encoded string of username:password
addendum:
digest authentication (RFC 2617) would be a little bit more
complicated, but totally doable as well, all you need is a md5
calculation, and there are good md5 implementations in lingo that are
fast enough for those tiny strings required for authentication.
Valentin Schmidt wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo