Not just Queensland perhaps.
The SA technology plan suggested outsourcing IT and having no project
funding no longer than 3 months.
The plan also included only 1 of 5 sections of the overall plan for
public comment.
The rest was TBA.
Perhaps things have changed since but it seemed a high risk with
public data projects having no public long term oversight/understanding.skills.
Projects funded to hit 3 month deliveries rather than long term
strategic outcomes and quality of system.
</imho>


On 9 May 2014 08:17, Jan Whitaker <jw...@janwhitaker.com> wrote:
> Good luck, Queenlanders.
>
>       
> http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/it-pro/government-it/queensland-technology-ranks-in-disarray-20140508-zr711.html
>
>
>
>
> Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
> jw...@janwhitaker.com
>
> Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how
> do you fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space.
> ~Margaret Atwood, writer
>
> _ __________________ _
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to