It's fairly common to see Telstra copper tied to rural fences. I've
never known them to even seek permission. The fence belongs to the
landholder. Telstra is using it to prop up their property. Surely the
landholder is entitled to rent or something.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/BIRRR/permal
On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 00:05 +, Forename Surname wrote:
> I wonder if my e.-mail address (abbottabad...@outlook.com) played a
> part in garnering such animosity? Do you not think it prescient to
> declare such connexions?
What - declare connections with a town in Pakistan? :-)
Regards, K.
--
At 11:05 AM 5/10/2017, Forename Surname wrote:
>P.s. I know such e.-mails as yours would be better let alone: but I'm a
>stubborn bastard.
That's it. I'm blocking you too.
goodbye
___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.ed
https://delimiter.com.au/2013/02/01/morons-freelancer-ceo-wants-acs-disbanded/
An anti-ACS article that turned up in a google search.
I'll admit: I don't know the prejudices of the author, but I found it
vindicating, in a shallow, pathetic way.
Reubs Newbs.
_
I recently bought a Cisco SPA112 analogue telephone adapter (ATA) in
anticipation of migrating to the NBN. It seems to be very good quality and
flexible, certainly better than the average integrated modem & VoIP device, but
it's intended to be deployed en-masse almost anywhere by telephony spec
https://twitter.com/adjohnsonACS/status/912196227273342976
I was interested to read:
"A real privilege to have @ScottMorrisonMP addressing @ACSnewsfeed members this
Thursday discussing Australia's evolving digital economy."
---Andrew Johnson @adjohnsonACS, 11:05 PM - 24 S
On 05/10/17 08:45, David Lochrin wrote:
On Wednesday 04 October 2017 at 18:46 I wrote:
The sender apparently works for Microsoft in a department known as "Microsoft
Routing, Peering, and DNS". If so, s/he should know better.
That's if the email-id in the header "[blah].prod.exchangelabs.com"
On Wednesday 04 October 2017 at 18:46 I wrote:
> The sender apparently works for Microsoft in a department known as "Microsoft
> Routing, Peering, and DNS". If so, s/he should know better.
That's if the email-id in the header "[blah].prod.exchangelabs.com" indicates
where he works. resolves t
On Wednesday 04 October 2017 at 15:09 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I'll second that. I find it quite rude to post anonymous rants on this list.
Yes, so do I. The sender apparently works for Microsoft in a department known
as "Microsoft Routing, Peering, and DNS". If so, s/he should know better.
Da
