GM all,
Ermanno, IK7EZN, replied directly to me about his first tests of MAP65.
He wanted to include some screen shots, and this list does not permit
attachments.
Ermanno's message will be of interest to others, so I am forwarding it
to the list without the attachments. I have posted his sc
Hello Joe ,
Tnx for the qso on 2m. Question : I suppose there is no objections to use
MAP65 with a single polarisation antenna ( H only)?
73 Dom/F6DRO
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list
Hi Ermanno,
Many thanks for your message with comments about MAP65! Here are some
initial responses...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joe .
This morning I have tried for the first time "on-line" MAP65.
1) As soon as shaped the program didn't decode . The PC with
Linux and Linrad didn't have t
Hi Dom,
f6dro wrote:
Hello Joe ,
Tnx for the qso on 2m. Question : I suppose there is no objections to
use MAP65 with a single polarisation antenna ( H only)?
73 Dom/F6DRO
I have received quite a few questions along the same line as yours.
Of course there is no objection to using MAP65 wi
Comments below quoted text...
As it is now, it is important that BOTH computers have their clocks set
to the correct time, within a second or so. I do this by starting
Linrad with a short script that first executes "ntpdate", then xlinrad.
Of course, the value will depend on clock settin
Hi Rick,
K9AO (Rick Kunath) wrote:
I am wondering why on the Linux machine you didn't just run the NTP
daemon? I've been using that method for years and it works extremely
well. Using the NTP daemon would allow for even better accuracy of the
clock on the Linux machine than just doing an ntpd
Hello Ermanno,
> The first impression is extremely positive particularly way the
> management of the automatic polarization also on signals that I was not
> able to see on the screen of Linrad.
???
Something is wrong here. In case you want the highest sensitivity and
set Linrad parameters ac
Hi Pierre,
Many thanks for your messages. As it happens, after your first message
I did almost exactly what is recommended in your second message. It
helps a lot, reducing the number of dropped packets to a very small
number. (Although not always exactly zero, the number is usually
smaller
