Joe Taylor wrote:
The other option that I'm beginning to think very attractive
is running both Linrad and MAP65 in a single machine. TIMF2
data could go from Linrad to MAP65 over the loopback (lo)
interface -- or by way of shared memory, or ???
Joe,
have you ever considered the possi
Stan wrote:
Hello Rick,
can you point me to some specific models for managed switches, so I can
read up ?
This should get you started:
http://www.ctrlink.com/managed_features.htm
There are also some really good docs available on Cisco's site after you
register.
The good stuff is Cisco ge
Hello Rick,
can you point me to some specific models for managed switches, so I can
read up ?
Thanks Stan,W1LE
Unfortunately neither of the switches you tested with had the
horsepower (i.e. were managed switches) to control the multicast
traffic, though they will segment the unicast traf
Rick and all,
Well, it seems I'm learning more about computer networking
than I ever wanted to know... ;-)
Why did you use a mask of 224.0.0.0 instead of 240.0.0.0 in your
multicast route statement on the Linux box?
(Your: # route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 224.0.0.0 dev eth1 statement.)
Rick Kunath wrote:
Looks like I missed a few center-click inadvertent pastes in
proofreading the previous post, but nothing that shouldn't be obvious :(
(Reminds self not to multi-task while replying to email messages.)
Rick
#
This
Joe Taylor wrote:
Additional information: "ipconfig" on Windows, "ifconfig" on Linux,
report the following IP addresses:
Computer A:172.16.28.67
Computer B(1): 172.16.28.69
Computer B(2): 192.168.10.13
Computer C(1): 172.16.28.31
Computer C(2): 192.168.10.12
This works fine (but of cou
Well, I found the following information about Ethernet switches:
"Data received on any port of a repeating hub will be repeated on all of
its ports. Unicast, broadcast and multicast messages are all the same to
a repeating hub. With a switching hub or switch, unicast messages are
only sent to
Rick, and all --
OK, I've a chance to make some more tests.
My computer network looks like this:
ADSL 10 Mb/s --> Computer_A
DSL --> Modem --> Ethernet --> Computer_B
Hub|
--> Computer_C
Three computers are connected to a
Rick --
Thanks for the suggestions, they are much appreciated. I have been tied
up since yesterday afternoon, but hope to find time to try them out soon
... maybe even later today. I will report back here on any success or
failure.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
Rick Kunath wrote:
Joe T
Joe Taylor wrote:
My earlier problem with dropped multicast packets seems to be fixed in
MAP65 v0.8. However, when running the Linrad-MAP65 combination on two
separate computers I still have some network-related problems. Perhaps
someone on this list who knows much more than I about networki
10 matches
Mail list logo
