On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:55:38 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> i took a look at it and it was a holdover from (i believe) QNX where
> their version of make did not support parallelism so that many of the
> rules were in the form:
> target: dep1 dep2 dep3 dep4
> $(MAKE) -C subdir1
>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:19:22 -0400
"Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
> On 2021-06-03 10:09 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
> > See the -j option
> Seems like a race condition waiting to happen.
Shouldn't be. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that make
calculates the dependency graph first, not in
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:29:43 -0400
"Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
> I am not aware of gnu make having any parallel processing
> capabilities.
See the -j option
Regards,
Dianne.
To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscr...@linux-ottawa.org
To get help send a blank message to
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:19:22 -0400
> "Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
>
> > On 2021-06-03 10:09 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
> > > See the -j option
>
> > Seems like a race condition waiting to happen.
>
> Shouldn't be. My understanding (which may be wrong) is
> On Jun 3, 2021, at 10:27, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>>
>> Shouldn't be. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that make
>> calculates the dependency graph first, not in parallel. Then it
>> executes as many parallel tasks as the -j option asks for, or that
>> make sense... whichever
On 2021-06-03 10:27, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Dianne Skoll wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:19:22 -0400
> > "Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-06-03 10:09 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
> > > > See the -j option
> >
> > > Seems like a race condition waiting to
On 03/06/2021 10:38, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 2021-06-03 10:22 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
Shouldn't be. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that make
calculates the dependency graph first, not in parallel. Then it
executes as many parallel tasks as the -j option asks for, or that
On 2021-06-03 10:22 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
Shouldn't be. My understanding (which may be wrong) is that make
calculates the dependency graph first, not in parallel. Then it
executes as many parallel tasks as the -j option asks for, or that
make sense... whichever is smaller. Since the
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:19:22 -0400
> "Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
>
> > On 2021-06-03 10:09 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
> > > See the -j option
>
> > Seems like a race condition waiting to happen.
>
> Shouldn't be. My understanding (which may be wrong) is
On 2021-06-03 10:09 a.m., Dianne Skoll wrote:
See the -j option
Seems like a race condition waiting to happen.
To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscr...@linux-ottawa.org
To get help send a blank message to linux+h...@linux-ottawa.org
To visit the archives:
On 2021-06-03 8:29 a.m., Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i *vaguely* recall (probably incorrectly) a possible race condition
in that both t1 and t2 will check their dependencies and, if they're
out of date, both try to update them at the same time, possibly
stepping on each other's work. i think
i'm probably overthinking this, but is there any problem with
defining a makefile with numerous targets that can be processed in
parallel if they all have the same set of dependencies (which can also
be processed in parallel)?
sample makefile i'm playing with:
.PHONY: all alldeps t1 t2 d1
12 matches
Mail list logo
