yes we are using clear case on suse linux 7.0 and very pleased with it
- Original Message -
From: "Gerard Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: Clear Case
> Trying to find out if anyone knows of or is using Clear Case, on Linux
Gerard Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to find out if anyone knows of or is using Clear Case, on Linux 390. I
> have a client that would like to port a major application to Linux but
> requires this software. Any help is appreciated.
>
Gerard,
ClearCase will export a file syst
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>I am trying to unmap the prefix page, if I do so the get_current
>has to be modified.
Er, it would seem that if you unmap the prefix page, get_current
would be the least of your problems ;-( What about all the other
uses of the lowcore (including those demanded by the archi
Trying to find out if anyone knows of or is using Clear Case, on Linux 390. I
have a client that would like to port a major application to Linux but requires
this software. Any help is appreciated.
At 11:37 21-06-02 -0500, Jay G Phelps wrote:
>What type of make steps should be followed for a RH7.2 kernel rebuild
You need to 'make image' instead of bzipl and copy the
arch/s390/boot/image to /boot and run zipl to use it.
Rob
I don't believe it's been ported, yet. If ever.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerard Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Clear Case
>
>
> Trying to find out if anyone knows of or is using Clear Case,
> on Linux 390. I
>
Hi,
I was trying to use the hosts.allow /.deny to limit who can access our
S390 SLES-7 guests. The man page says first that .allow is searched, then
.deny and then falls through and is allowed by default. I'm trying to do a
NFS mount and getting this:
Welcome to SuSE SLES-7 (s390) - Kernel
Carlos, We have changed the device addresses from E50 to E60 since my first note. I
did a cat /proc/chandev and got the following:
Before the echo commands --
chan_type key bitfield ctc=0x01, escon=0x2, lcs=0x4, osad=0x8, qeth=0x10,claw=0x20
*'s for cu/dev tpe/models indicate don't cares
cauti
What type of make steps should be followed for a RH7.2 kernel rebuild? I
was expecting a make config && make dep && make bzipl && make modules &&
make modules_install sequence. All of these work except the kernel build
itself (bzipl in my example). A quick look at the Makefile doesn't suggest
a
>[...]
> However, what's the point? Loading current from the prefix page
> costs one cycle (assuming it is in L1 cache); on our platform
> register->register operations and memory->register operations
> from L1 usually take the same time.
I am trying to unmap the prefix page, if I do so the get_
I especially like this part on "workload sizing".
http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220020617jdt01.htm&fromtm=e1012
Workload sizing The ability to size Linux mainframe workloads
will require special care, as common benchmark data is not
available yet. So far, only a Sendmail benc
Pete,
You should NOT use control registers for the following reasons:
1) They are slow to load and store (especially under VM)
2) If you do get it to work you cannot use the function for which
the control register was designed
3) If you use unassigned bits future architectural changes will
c
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Must have caught it on a the server equivalent of a bad hair day. It
worked for me.
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke
On Friday, 06/21/2002 at 08:51 AST, Rich Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello -
> I shut my Linux down with: SHUTDOWN NOW -H
> Now I'm unable to ipl linux.
>
> I enter: ipl 292 clear
> CP responds with: HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 000A
> 029C
>
> Have searched the vm "Sy
Hello -
I shut my Linux down with: SHUTDOWN NOW -H
Now I'm unable to ipl linux.
I enter: ipl 292 clear
CP responds with: HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 000A
029C
Have searched the vm "System Errors and Messages CP" manual but cannot find
a wait state code of 29C so I'm not su
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 17:30, Lionel Dyck wrote:
>
> An interesting article with some postive things to say.
Unfortunately, I'll never know!
"You have attempted to access Membership-level content"
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>Since interrupt stacks were split, current sits in the prefix page.
>Did anyone think about returning it into a register? I am not
>sufficiently familiar with the architecture to figure it out.
>Candidates include control 10 (PER start), control 15 (Linkage),
>and GPR 12. Pos
Not at all, we use "shutdown -r now" wait a few... and telnet back into it
without problems. Something I noticed is that when it IPLs, it moves. I
guess is a perception but it appears very fast. Carlos :-)
Saying goes: Great minds think alike - I say: Great minds think for
themselves!
Carlos A
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:23:19AM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> PER appears to be used, I am not sure if that's actually the case.
PER is definately used. PTRACE. DProbes uses it as well for single
stepping the original instruction after a probe point is handled.
Thanks
Mike
> http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220020617jdt01.htm&fromtm=e101-2
>
> An interesting article with some postive things to say.
It was when I read it first thing this morning. I just went back for another read and
got a
login page.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
Hello,
I've just installed Linux RedHat 7.2 on VM image. During installation i've selected
x11 applications and desktop environment as Kde and Gnome. After installation i've
also checked with "rpm -qa" command if packages was installed and everithings seems to
be fine, but I'm not able to la
21 matches
Mail list logo
