Re: Success stories, planning for success?

2004-01-23 Thread Sergey Korzhevsky
22.01.2004 21:10:11 Wolfe, Gordon W wrote: Things that we or our users are finding essential, but which do not in fact exist in the marketplace yet are: Virus-checking software for your Samba and e-mail Linux servers Web single-signon software Tivoli Access Manager (WebSeal, etc)?

Re: SLES Installation: extended passive mode?

2004-01-23 Thread Nick Laflamme
Alex deVries wrote: How about just using scp? It's much simpler. e.g. on your ia32 Linux system, run: scp file-to-transfer root@ip-address-of-instance:/tmp Maybe I trimmed my earlier note too much, but the context is the SuSE installation process. I have no idea how I'd try to convince the

Re: SLES Installation: extended passive mode?

2004-01-23 Thread Sergey Korzhevsky
23.01.2004 14:47:05 Nick Laflamme wrote: Maybe I trimmed my earlier note too much, but the context is the SuSE installation process. I have no idea how I'd try to convince the SLES I think, you can't. install process to use scp, and I doubt the scp daemon, if there is one, is running on the

Re: OSA-2 sharing between Linux LPARS

2004-01-23 Thread Kevin George
The OSA-2 must be defined as shared in HCD (iocds) and OSASF needs to be run to setup the OAT for each LPAR that will access the OSA. You will need to define the IP addresses and the device addresses for each LPAR. You can use the same device addresses in each LPAR. Be sure and define all of the

Re: SLES Installation: extended passive mode?

2004-01-23 Thread Ferguson, Neale
I use vsftpd all the time for installs/updates without any problem. Neale

Subject: Re: SLES8 install

2004-01-23 Thread Ken Vance
Hi, Thanks for the responses. The problem with the SuSE 8 install turned out to be a CD mount issue. The installation CD was mounted on a UNIX system, but I believe it was not mounted with the correct options. The Unix support person here talked to SuSE, and they had them remount the CD so

NT SNA Print Srv to LPAR Linux

2004-01-23 Thread Tom Butler
Our current NT SNA print servers are entering their end-of-life cycle. These servers handle our current IMS/CICS SNA requirements out to the field. If anyone has successfully done this port/migration I'd appreciate hearing from them concerning the challenges of doing so. Thanks in

Re: NT SNA Print Srv to LPAR Linux

2004-01-23 Thread Rich Smrcina
One thing to check is if these printers also support LPR. If they do, than the project would involve changing the SNA definitions to LPR definitions. That might seem pretty simplistic and I'm sure there would be more challenges (report formatting, spacing, etc), but in a nutshell that's what

Re: SLES Installation: extended passive mode?

2004-01-23 Thread Post, Mark K
My Slackware system runs Proftpd, and has served up both RHEL and SLES installs for my z/VM guests. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Laflamme Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SLES

Re: SLES Installation: extended passive mode?

2004-01-23 Thread Nick Laflamme
Ferguson, Neale wrote: I use vsftpd all the time for installs/updates without any problem. Cool, we have a winner. The firewall guy and I did a trace; the SLES installation process wasn't recognizing responses it was getting from the BSD ftpd I was running. Maybe if I'd looked longer and

Re: NT SNA Print Srv to LPAR Linux

2004-01-23 Thread Joachim Schmidt
to ease your migration (SNA-Print to IP-Printers or IP-Printservers) you should use z/OS Infoprint Server (or OS/390 Infoprint Server). Using this aproach there is no need to change any application or transaction for a new (non-SNA) printer infrastructure - means use your IP-Printers for any

Re: NT SNA Print Srv to LPAR Linux

2004-01-23 Thread Paul Landay
Tom Butler wrote: Our current NT SNA print servers are entering their end-of-life cycle. These servers handle our current IMS/CICS SNA requirements out to the field. If anyone has successfully done this port/migration I'd appreciate hearing from them concerning the challenges of

Weird OSA issue...anyone else???

2004-01-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
Hi folks, I've been running into a problem every so often that I can't track down and thought I'd just throw it out here to see if I get any bites. I have 2 Gbit OSAs that I share among my guests and use VIPA to provide failover in case one goes down. So, every guest has an eth0, eth1, and an

Re: Weird OSA issue...anyone else???

2004-01-23 Thread David Kreuter
Well don't have an answer for you but have seen an other weird linux osa situation. Client presents me with a linux image with two osa cards at eth0 and eth1. eth0 172.27.194.153 eth1 172.27.94.153 eth1:1 172.27.88.51 eth1:2 172.27.88.52 eth1:3 172.27.8853 Eth1:3 are according to client VIPA's.

Re: Weird OSA issue...anyone else???

2004-01-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
Hmm. I see the problem at the workstation. Poke around for a bit and notice that eth1 is not aliased in modules.conf. Add an alias to modules.conf for eth1 and the problem goes away. Cannot be recreated. ... so it' s fixed ... no ... we remove the update to modules.conf and cannot

aliases

2004-01-23 Thread Alikhani
Hi all I want to use an userall aliases only for a special user . Meanwhile I want only this user can use this aliase to send e-mail for all and nobody can use this aliase for some reasons. What must i do ? -- sophia __ Inflex - installed on mailserver for