Hi dear List,
I am about to add a hipersocket device to our Linux RHEL4 LPAR/z-series.
The driver documentation suggests:
echo read_device_bus_id,write_device_bus_id,data_device_bus_id
/sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/qeth/group
But this command does not do anything visible, the file group keeps
On Tuesday, 04/11/2006 at 05:44 CST, Lee Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since z/OS is more difficult to get changes made on, we went with a
definintion that's already there... It has a hipersocket defined with
IP address 192.168.11.10 and a mask of 255.255.255.0.
We have the 192.168.11.0
Shouldn't you just be able to create a guest LAN/vswitch that uses a
hipersocket device group on VM as the interface and then present that to each
linux guest as device 9200 or somesuch? That way all the traffic on the
hipersocket is handled by VM, and all the linux guests can talk on that
On 4/12/06, James Melin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't you just be able to create a guest LAN/vswitch that uses a
hipersocket device group on VM as the interface and then present that to each
No, VSWITCH requires an OSA Express interface to go out, not
hipersockets. But I do agree it
On Wednesday, 04/12/2006 at 09:10 EST, James Melin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't you just be able to create a guest LAN/vswitch that uses a
hipersocket device group on VM as the interface and then present that to
each
linux guest as device 9200 or somesuch? That way all the traffic on the
Shouldn't you just be able to create a guest LAN/vswitch that uses a
hipersocket device group on VM as the interface and then present that
to
each
linux guest as device 9200 or somesuch? That way all the traffic on
the
hipersocket is handled by VM, and all the linux guests can talk on
that
I'm curious over how available the UnionFS (made famous or infamous by
Knoppix) would be?
Anyone have useful pointers/URLs?
John R. Campbell, Speaker to Machines (GNUrd) (813) 356-5322 (t/l 697)
Adsumo ergo raptus sum
MacOS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was
On 4/12/06, John Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious over how available the UnionFS (made famous or infamous by
Knoppix) would be?
I started working with unionfs some time ago and it is pretty cool.
There was an error in one of the macros in the s390 kernel source, but
I believe that
Hello,
After issuing xautolog pkdl0105 from our V M : O p e r a t o
r System Window
We get the following message: 22:14:16 PKDL0105 *8 Starting
weblogic_pc: execvp: No such file or directory
22:14:16 PKDL0105 *8
[FAILED]
We can
IIRC, UnionFS was part of the core of the Levanta virtual server product,
when we looked at it in 2003-2004. The idea was that you installed each
product group in a separate filesystem, and then layered them onto each other
to produce custom-tailored images. Obviously, they had it working on
On 4/12/06, Hall, Ken (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, UnionFS was part of the core of the Levanta virtual server product,
when we looked at it in 2003-2004. The idea was that you installed each
product group in a separate filesystem, and then layered them onto each other
to produce
Could be. When we first looked at Levanta, back in the 03-04 time frame, I was
very curious about how they did what they claimed. I'd never heard of UnionFS,
and they told me that's what their product was based on: UnionFS mounts over
NFS.
I don't know what they're doing now, but last we
I am trying to install Mono. I went to this page
(http://www.go-mono.com/download/sles-9-s390x/) where it says:
The best way to install Mono on your system is to use Novell's Red Carpet.
If you do not already have Red Carpet, you can download it.
To use Red Carpet, execute these commands:
rug
Could you send more informations ? I mean CPU type (model, ifl or not),
memory size for virtual machine, heap size for java, average workload on
Linux, type of application (standalone, Websphere). I support customers
with WebSphere and DB2 on Linux for zSeries - respons time is not bad,
but
Try it without gtk-sharp as that package hasn't been ported to s390(x).
If this doesn't work then I think the easiest way is to just download the
zip file containing all the RPMs and use the RPM command to install them.
I've not tried the rug-rat method.
-Original Message-
Should I just
I will be out of the office starting 04/12/2006 and will not return until
04/13/2006.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
Subject:May 3 IBM Webcast - The IBM System z(tm): Rethinking the Role of the
Mainframe
Cross-posted to IBMVM,IBM-MAIN,and LINUX listservs for your reading pleasure
Date:Wednesday, May 3, 2006
Time: 2:00pm - 3:30pm EDT
Register: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/2006
This webcast looks to
Wow - we haven't learned much from our mainframe (well, z/OS) experiences,
I guess - where you mostly use SMP/E but some vendors try to put stuff
around it to make it easier, some use a different install method, etc.
This is the third method I will have used (other than the initial install)
and I
rpm is what sits behind yast installation.
its not difficult. rpm -Uvh will usually get you there -- assuming you've
met all of the dependencies.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Hare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
rug will be the best way of doing things, just that I never ported GTK# to
s390. Did you try the install without it?
(Under the covers Yast2/rug are just using the rpm command set. Rug just
simplifies things like dependency checking.)
-Original Message-
Wow - we haven't learned much from
I tried installing without GTK but there are still dependency problems
with the version I was getting via Red Carpet (1.1.14 I recall) - for
glib2, gmodule, gthread but I believe I have those installed already.
I've been trying to use the RPM command to download it and install from
the go-mono
21 matches
Mail list logo
