No. The ping attempt was not made from the same subnet. We will try
this on the next attempt.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:13 PM, "Mark Post" wrote:
On 2/2/2012 at 04:14 PM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS >>> > wrote:
>> My cohort said that in his latest try, he removed all the extr
We faced something similar with Redhat, albeit 3+ years ago, and I ended
up implementing the following as part of our build procedure. It might
be worthwhile to at least read the kbase article and see if this sounds
similar:
===
# Add a stanza to /etc/pam.d
>>> On 2/2/2012 at 04:34 PM, "Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco"
wrote:
> How can I tell if this is a known issue with SuSE, Novell, or Attachmate?
> Is anyone else using LDAP and experiencing this problem?
By opening a service request with your support provider. Share your research
with the
>>> On 2/2/2012 at 04:14 PM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
>>> wrote:
> My cohort said that in his latest try, he removed all the extraneous
> interfaces, and had the same result. He said he tried to ping it and did not
> get a response.
My question, though, was the ping attempt made from the same
We use YaST to configure everything and it made no difference. We also
eliminated PAM as the problem as well. Additional testing results are as
follows:
If we shut down the remote LDAP server everything is fine, nss will get
?not available? and will continue with the local files. This allows us
This is a layer 3 vswitch.
From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
[mp...@novell.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:41 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone lose network connectivity during upgrade to SLE
My cohort said that in his latest try, he removed all the extraneous
interfaces, and had the same result. He said he tried to ping it and did not
get a response.
From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
[mp...@novell.com]
>>> On 2/2/2012 at 02:34 PM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
>>> wrote:
> We have also made an update run where we removed the interfaces from the
> guest before we started. The results were the same. We try to connect
> to 10.80.200.126
> and do not get a response.
> Any ideas?
Also, is this a Layer
>>> On 2/2/2012 at 02:34 PM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
>>> wrote:
> We have also made an update run where we removed the interfaces from the
> guest before we started. The results were the same. We try to connect
> to 10.80.200.126
> and do not get a response.
> Any ideas?
When you do this with
Hello,
We are in the midst of performing our first upgrade from SLES10 SP4 to
SLES11 SP1 and are having network connection issues.
We are attempting to upgrade our Linux "sandbox" system that runs under
z/VM. We ipl from the card reader and perform the first part of the
upgrade just fine. After
10 matches
Mail list logo
