Hello everyone.
I found a lot of very useful information here but this time I have some
doubts so I decided to subscribe and ask.
Recently we upgraded our hardware (z9 + DS6000 -> z114 + DS6000 + XIV) and
we have to make some choices.
There is a chance that at some point we will have to get rid of
Actually the customer doesn't want to touch with their production
disks even though via network like NFS. So, ...
2012/3/20 Emmett O'Grady :
> Can you export the AIX filesystem with NFS and then mount it on your client
> (Linux on Z)?
>
> Emmett
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: jaehwa
>
Can you export the AIX filesystem with NFS and then mount it on your client
(Linux on Z)?
Emmett
- Original Message -
From: jaehwa
Sent: 20.03.2012 09:54 ZE9
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Mount an AIX filesystem on zLinux?
Hi there,
Is it possible to mount an AIX filesystem(J
Googling around looks like SLES doesn't support it - the utilities are no
longer included ... but I believe all you'd need is the jfsutils rpm.
Anyway - yes - quite possible. I searched on 'jfs s390x' to find info..
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jerry Park wrote:
> Hi there
Hi there,
Is it possible to mount an AIX filesystem(JFS) on zLinux?
One of my customer is considering about zLinux as their batch system.
Their existing AIX systems are using Oracle, the customer wants to
replicate their AIX Oracle disks to disks attached with zLinux,
and mount this replicated AI
Thanks to all that spent time in trying to help me on this issue.
1st time in my DP life (... after 42 years on the road ...)
HM
-Mensagem original-
De: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] Em nome de Doug
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 19 de março de 2012 20:24
Para: LINUX-39
Time to update your Disaster Recover documentation/procedures, get management
to back you up! Nothing like the REAL thing to get some focus on the real issue!
Rebuild and move on.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2012, at 17:07, RPN01 wrote:
> I'm assuming that the disks that were scratched were
On Monday, 03/19/2012 at 06:35 EDT, Shane G wrote:
> LVM is greatly lauded as an "Enterprise" solution, but the initial
design was
> terribly flawed, and numerous iterations to rectify it have not been
entirely
> fruitful.
Striping of any stripe (physical or logical) is there to protect you from
It doesn't matter much - all the important meta-data is at the "front" and
gets clobbered first.
Usually.
LVM is greatly lauded as an "Enterprise" solution, but the initial design was
terribly flawed, and numerous iterations to rectify it have not been entirely
fruitful.
IMHO of course.
Even if on
> Sadly to say, but my reality is that the back-up (which was made in a separate
> x86 machine) was neglected by the people in charge.
At this point, you're pretty much screwed. With no backup, there's pretty much
nothing that can be done.
---
Ron,
I don´t how far the formatting exec went, before the machine hanging.
-Mensagem original-
De: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] Em nome de Foster,
Ron
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 19 de março de 2012 16:41
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Assunto: Re: Emergency
Did all
Robert,
Yes, I totally agree w/ you.
But do you know some saying ... you concentrate all things too much on your
hands ... you should delegate ...
Helio Mario
-Mensagem original-
De: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] Em nome de RPN01
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 19 de març
Hendrik (or anyone),
Can you help us with one small issue I cannot seem to find the answer on
with the install of this neat tool.
I am doing the noarch rpm install and getting:
rpm -ivh lnxhc-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.2-1 is needed by
Did all seven disk drives get reformatted?
Ron Foster
From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Helio Mario
Neves Pimentel de Oliveira [h...@engepel.com.br]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 2:14 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Eme
I'm assuming that the disks that were scratched were the ones on the "old"
side of the migration, and without useful backups, I'd have to say that
you're probably out of luck at this point. I would have thought that there'd
have been several points in this process where the system pointed out to th
>>> On 3/19/2012 at 01:01 PM, "Foster, Ron" wrote:
> Does the terminal server use ttys?
No, it uses a different program and only virtual devices (not virtualized just
virtual). There are two flavors (which I haven't had the time to understand
how they differ): iucvtty, and /dev/hvc? names.
Yes 7 disks.
I don´t how far the formatting exec went, before the machine hanging.
Sadly to say, but my reality is that the back-up (which was made in a
separate x86 machine) was neglected by the people in charge.
All this happened during the storage migration SHARK to DS8000.
Yes we built a seco
The terminal server creates an IUCVTTY device. Really cool.
David Kreuter
Original Message
Subject: Re: Are your Linux instances healthy?
From: "Foster, Ron"
Date: Mon, March 19, 2012 1:01 pm
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Does the terminal server use ttys?
So, you have seven disks involved. Which disk(s) were formatted?
Key question: Do you have any sort of backups of the disks, and at what
level? (File level or device level) How old are they?
How active were (i.e. How much updating was there on) the disks?
Do you have a second Linux image on whic
>>> On 3/19/2012 at 03:14 PM, Helio Mario Neves Pimentel de Oliveira
wrote:
> What was submitted via YAST:
> - activate DASD
> - format DASD
>
> During this process this LPAR (named LINUX2) stopped / hanged.
> No more jobs were processed in this machine.
>
> Is there a way to rebuilt the "file
Hi Mark and all listers,
We are in a great trouble.
A guy of our tech team inadvertently submitted a job to 'format' the disk.
So, there was a SUBSTANTIAL & CRITIC DATA LOSS.
Scenario:
z10
Suse 10 SP4
1 disk for the OS
2 LVMs with 3 disks each
Address 0.0.
Does the terminal server use ttys?
From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Mark Post
[mp...@novell.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 11:20 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Are your Linux instances healthy?
>>> On 3/19/2
Yes, I did both
mkinitrd
zipl
neither of which helped. The dasd_config was the answer.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Richard Troth
wrote:
> You probably need to re-stamp the initial RAM disk to know about the
> new drive. Barring other requirements, that would be ...
>
>mkinitrd
>
>>> On 3/19/2012 at 11:22 AM, RPN01 wrote:
> The third exception is about having ttys defined, without having programs
> running to talk to them. I buy this one. I'm not sure why the zLinux images
> define tty devices, when there are no interfaces for these to talk to. They
> just waste memory an
>>> On 3/19/2012 at 12:06 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> Which will probably fail, since you've already brought it online. (Which
> makes me think a "write the udev rules anyway" switch would be a nice
> enhancement request.)
I have to take that back. The "already online" message is simply informativ
>>> On 3/19/2012 at 09:36 AM, Mark Pace wrote:
> I'm having problems with the new disk I just added to an LVM group. When I
> reboot the system the new DASD is not online. So I have to do a chccwdev
> -e 0.0.0207 How do I make it come online automatically when I boot?
If you're talking about
It called out three exceptions, two of which that I thought were a bit odd,
all rated medium.
The first is that it found no driver for device 0.0.0009. Since my console,
though disconnected, is working just fine, I have to assume that there is
some driver active to it, so I'm not sure what the com
Did you do a mkinitrd before you rebooted.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2012, at 8:44 AM, "Mark Pace" wrote:
> I'm having problems with the new disk I just added to an LVM group.
> When I
> reboot the system the new DASD is not online. So I have to do a
> chccwdev
> -e 0.0.0207 How do
While I believe all our meetings are good ones, I think the upcoming one is
overflowing with VM and Linux goodness:
Date: March 28, 2012
Location: Computer Associates
2291 Wood Oak Drive
Herndon VA
Time: 8:30 for 9:00 until 2pm
STASH - Jim Porell IBM
This session
Found it. Searched back through old posts and found the answer.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Pace wrote:
> I'm having problems with the new disk I just added to an LVM group. When
> I reboot the system the new DASD is not online. So I have to do a chccwdev
> -e 0.0.0207 How do I ma
Or use L2 connections and DHCP. They don't get a chance to screw it up then.
Or see my other suggestion: separate GLAN/VSWITCH segments. At least the
student can only screw themselves that way.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / sig
You probably need to re-stamp the initial RAM disk to know about the
new drive. Barring other requirements, that would be ...
mkinitrd
zipl
-- R;
Rick Troth
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Pace wrote:
> I'm having proble
I'm having problems with the new disk I just added to an LVM group. When I
reboot the system the new DASD is not online. So I have to do a chccwdev
-e 0.0.0207 How do I make it come online automatically when I boot?
TIA!
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 3/15/2012 a
Thanks to all of you that provided your input. Looks like there is no
very simple way to avoid this. We did use one tactic that was suggested,
but did not post on the class wall any threats of physical harm if the
wrong I.P. address was used.
Roy Costa
IBM International Technical Support Organi
I was thinking about it yesterday, and come with this: what if you assign
the guests to a vswitch with isolation mode turned on and put the FTP
server in another interface? The guest with incorrect IP would not "poison"
the ARP cache of everybody, and you could configure your gateway to drop
any pa
35 matches
Mail list logo
