> you aren't the only one.
>
> Something's definitely different. Open a case with your Linux support.
>
> For at least all of the system volumes (ones needed to boot) , consider
> erasing the 51-dasd* rules in /etc/udev/rules.d and then using "chzdev -e "
> to put back new 41-dasd-eckd* rules.
> T
Guys...
Linux is not UNIX. It used to kinda sorta be, but it isn't anymore. The
people who like the UNIX way are a small minority in the Linux community.
Everyone ( besides you ) wants it to go towards the magical MacOS land of
'do what I want without asking me about it all the time'
for example
On 4/30/20 12:41 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
> Bitching and moaning aside, what the article describes from 'homed' is
> already accomplished using 'autofs'. This is another case of SystemD
> subsuming some satisfactory subsystem. Why?
...
> I get a strong sense that someone just dislikes the historical U
Hello!
Um no. They swam off last week, leaving the recently hatched ones to
run things. Sorry Dave M, in the world of Linux a really bad penguin
joke is normally appropriate for SystemD. Personally, I prefer systems
without it, which is why I run Slackware here. The only system I do
have is a Pi wh
You sure this article isn't 30 days late?
Thanks,
Sam
(217) 862-9227 (office)
(602) 327-2134 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 10:11 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Future-Watch: Big changes to log
On 4/30/20 10:31 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> This might be of some interest to the folks that follow this list.
>
> Scheduled for release this year. If adopted, it has the potential for
> good and ill. /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow going away, replaced with
> encrypted JSON, and other changes.
>
> https:
So what I'd like is a POSIX system with a Linux kernel and Gnu userspace.
Bitching and moaning aside, what the article describes from 'homed' is
already accomplished using 'autofs'. This is another case of SystemD
subsuming some satisfactory subsystem. Why?
I confess that I didn't follow all the
[deepest sarcasm voice]
excuse me, but the system you refer to as Linux is actually a SystemD
system with a Linux kernel and GNU userspace.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:21 AM Luciano Mannucci
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:42:33 +
> David Boyes wrote:
>
> >somebody please make it stop
>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:42:33 +
David Boyes wrote:
>somebody please make it stop
>
> +1.
Devuan on S/360?
Freebsd?
Luciano.
--
/"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy)
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250
X AGAINST HTML M
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:31:53 -0700
Dave Jones wrote:
> This might be of some interest to the folks that follow this list.
>
> Scheduled for release this year. If adopted, it has the potential for
> good and ill. /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow going away, replaced with
> encrypted JSON, and other cha
On 4/30/20, 10:41 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Troth"
wrote:
somebody please make it stop
+1.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with
somebody please make it stop
On 4/30/20 10:31 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> This might be of some interest to the folks that follow this list.
>
> Scheduled for release this year. If adopted, it has the potential for
> good and ill. /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow going away, replaced with
> encrypted JSON
This might be of some interest to the folks that follow this list.
Scheduled for release this year. If adopted, it has the potential for
good and ill. /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow going away, replaced with
encrypted JSON, and other changes.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/linux-home-director
I have one of this, three masters two workers and all over z/VM.
El jue., 30 abr. 2020 a las 10:12, Dan Horák () escribió:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:56:40 +0400
> Peter wrote:
>
> > Hello Group
> >
> > Apologies for the dumb question.
> >
> > Can we run openshift on zlinux running on top of zVM(z
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:56:40 +0400
Peter wrote:
> Hello Group
>
> Apologies for the dumb question.
>
> Can we run openshift on zlinux running on top of zVM(z14 hardware)
> instead of linuxone ? Is there anyone who have tried this ? Or else
> this is only specific to linuxone box ?
yes, z14 with
Hello Group
Apologies for the dumb question.
Can we run openshift on zlinux running on top of zVM(z14 hardware) instead
of linuxone ? Is there anyone who have tried this ? Or else this is only
specific to linuxone box ?
Peter
-
Dan Horák wrote:
>and with virt-manager it should be even easier, it will hide all the low
>level details and will present a VM that "just work"
Yes, virt-manager is a handy tool (where available).
Alan Altmark wrote:
>Nice piece of work! (I never realized QEMU was a general purpose
>emulator, ca
17 matches
Mail list logo