On Wednesday 17 January 2007 03:33, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
There has not been much maintenance on sysctl in years, and as a result is
there is a lot to do to allow future interesting work to happen, and being
ambitious I'm trying to do it all at once :)
The patches in this series fall into
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:13:47AM +0900, Yoshioka Tsuneo wrote:
Hello
If we use 64bit kernel on ia64/x86_64/s390 architecture, and we run
32bit binary on 32bit compatibility mode, sendfile system call seems be
not set offset argument.
This is because sendfile's return value is not zero but
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 03:01:49PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
David, I applaud your effort to take care of this.
However, this patch will conflict with what I've
sent into Linus already for Sparc. I also had to
add the sys_altroot syscall entry as well.
I've mentioned several times that
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 04:41:44PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because
it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold
up the whole linux testing
