I'm just wondering about quantities of disk space that concern people.
Is 30GB noticeable - or in the noise?
--henry schaffer
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Mark writes:
...
And if they're
running Windows (as I would guess most may be), then wouldn't using X or VNC
would be equally difficult or easy?
Not at all. It's much easier to run vncviewer on Windows than it is to try
and get X running.
On Windows PuTTY is easy and does ssh, and
John McKown writes:
... I mainly script in UNIX using Perl due to familiarity. And because
I love regular expressions. ...
Regular expressions are a very powerful tool - and well integrated
into Perl - but there is a learning curve. I learned a lot about them
from Unix and Perl books - but
Scott writes:
I've got 2+2=4 locked in myself :-)
Isn't that this a specific case, and your patent really is of + ?
--henry schaffer
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
David writes:
...
1) They're counting only RHEL and SLES. Doesn't count Ubuntu, which
seems to power most of the netbooks ...
FWIW, I recently bought an ASUS eee PC900 and it runs Debian. I think
they've sold a lot of netbooks.
--
--henry schaffer
David Andrews writes:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:37 -0400, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
PuTTY fork called KiTTY that was just recently
updated. It has all the PuTTY features (since it is a fork from it) and
more:
... plus a nasty limitation. From their website:
KiTTY is only designed for
Dodds, Jim wrote:
... So now we are planning on spending close to $200,000 on Dell
hardware and Microsoft server software. ...
Has any looked at reliability? Some hardware/sofware combinations are
boringly reliable, some not so. Does anyone care?
--henry schaffer
Erik writes:
... Right now Microsoft has a choice. Rework M$
Office such that it will happily and effectively inter-operate with
other office productivity suites, or stop selling M$ Office in Europe.
Difficult decision, since an inter-operable M$ Office is an M$ Office
your company can
Tomasz writes:
I have a file on Unix server. When I transfer that file from Unix to Linux
using FTP - I'm getting file with the same size.
When I use SFTP, I'm getting file smaller by 79 bytes. The file has 79
lines.
That file is then FTP from Linux to z/OS - using FTP batch job on z/OS
Lea writes:
Inefficiency? Aren't all interpretive languages inefficient by
definition versus compiled languages?
Maybe, it depends.
Many interpreted languages call well coded / compiled routines, so the
majority of the execution time very well may be in the routines. (Think
APL. :-)
It
John writes:
David Andrews wrote:
According to TIOBE
(http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html)
Ruby is the 10th most popular programming language today.
And rising, 9th today.
Java is #1 and COBOL is #15. Check it out and see where
your
Kevin R writes:
Sounds like too little, too late to me.
The release of Symphony may be much less significant that IBM's
involvement in OpenOffice.org
I often use Star / Open Office and its an excellent set of
productivity tools. In my experience its main downside is that
sometimes it has
Dave writes:
From the IBM-MAIN list:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/11/technology/11novell.html?ref=business
In the 102-page ruling, the judge, Dale A. Kimball, also said Novell
could force SCO to abandon its claims against I.B.M.
Perhaps the best place to read all the details is at
John Summerfield writes:
...
btw, not every implementation if vi is equal, vile is well-named, nvi is
ok, vigor is an enhanced nvi, but my favourite is vim, because there's a
GUI version of it (and a build for Windows).
I agree about vim - it's what vi should have been :-) (and probably
I'm not sure I know what is a railroad diagram and don't have the
Pascal book handy (hey, I don't learn every new language which comes
along. :-)
Are there links to URLs which show/explain these things?
--
--henry schaffer
John writes:
I want to find the first comment line that begins with a target string
in column 1 (#target) and replace only that first target line with
another string.
There are multiple lines that begin with #target.
I've struck out with sed (not that I know sed).
Any quick hints on a sed
John Summerfied writes:
...
I have not heard of any failed Intel or AMD CPUs in a very long time.
Accompanying system components such as RAM, disks, NICs, yes, but not
the CPU itself. The systems I use are built to be cheap; one can have
greater reliability for a greater price. I imagine that
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:30:54AM -0700, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
The quoted documentation corresponds to my understanding to the -o
option. As I stated in my question: vim -o file1 file2 should open
two windows, one with file1 and the other with file2. It doesn't do
that on the Intel Linux
On my Sun/Solaris I'm running VIM version 6.3 and it handles (as I
wrote earlier) both vim -o test1 test2 and vim -o3 properly.
My Intel/Linux runs version 6.3.71 (from the Fedora distribution) and
does exactly the same thing. (vim -h only says 6.3)
--henry schaffer
19 matches
Mail list logo
