On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 21:11:59 +0200, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Dean, David (I/S) david_d...@bcbst.com
wrote:
Why do my swap disks go away when the zvm is ipl'ed? They are defined
in the USER DIRECTORY, they are then created on each Linux box as
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:34:25 -0400, Dean, David (I/S)
david_d...@bcbst.com wrote:
Can some of you weigh in on the merits (demerits) of defining multiple
CPU's to virtual Linux boxes? We are heavy WebSphere and have gotten
differing opinions.
For what it's worth we generally allocate vCPUs in
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:53:21 +0200, Rob van der Heij
rvdh...@velocity-software.com wrote:
If it is non-blocking, why would one be concerned about the elapsed
time of GC and what would be the interest of having multiple threads
working in parallel on GC. Or would you really have allocation
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:24:06 -0500, Daniel Tate daniel.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
At this point i see two problems:
1) Why is OOM Kill not functioning properly
2) Why is websphere performance so awful?
If you run WAS (or any Java app) in swap, performance will be terrible, as
a rule of thumb; if
