Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-24 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 24 May 2018, Timothy Sipples wrote: > Russ Herrold wrote: > > It may turn out that we (ClefOS) need to fork and offer two > > variants > > I guess I'd call them "streams" rather than "forks." One might, but in Red Hat parlance the 'Z' [a namespace collision here, NOT referring to Arch]

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-24 Thread Neale Ferguson
Out of curiosity what is in s390utils-2.x that wouldn't work on a 3.10 kernel? On 5/24/18, 03:01, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Viktor VM Mihajlovski" wrote: On 24.05.2018 06:59, Timothy Sipples wrote: Specifically,

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-24 Thread Neale Ferguson
90@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Viktor VM Mihajlovski Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 2:01 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: 7.5 package levels [External Content] Please use caution. On 24.05.2018 06:59, Timothy Sipples wrote: > Russ Herrold wrote: >>

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-24 Thread Terri C. Glowaniak
package levels [External Content] Please use caution. On 24.05.2018 06:59, Timothy Sipples wrote: > Russ Herrold wrote: >> It may turn out that we (ClefOS) need to fork and offer two variants > > I guess I'd call them "streams" rather than "forks." > > Fo

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-24 Thread Viktor VM Mihajlovski
On 24.05.2018 06:59, Timothy Sipples wrote: > Russ Herrold wrote: >> It may turn out that we (ClefOS) need to fork and offer two >> variants > > I guess I'd call them "streams" rather than "forks." > > For what it's worth, Red Hat seems to offer at least 3 major streams now: > Fedora (their

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-23 Thread Timothy Sipples
Russ Herrold wrote: >It may turn out that we (ClefOS) need to fork and offer two >variants I guess I'd call them "streams" rather than "forks." For what it's worth, Red Hat seems to offer at least 3 major streams now: Fedora (their "community" release), RHEL Structure A, and RHEL. The RHEL

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-23 Thread R P Herrold
On Wed, 23 May 2018, Timothy Sipples wrote: > There's a new dual build/delivery approach that Red Hat has > introduced with RHEL 7.5. RHEL 7.5 offers an alternate build > stream called "Structure A," One reason for Neale's questions in part are that the ClefOS 7.5 build has been being bitten by

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-23 Thread Timothy Sipples
There's a new dual build/delivery approach that Red Hat has introduced with RHEL 7.5. RHEL 7.5 offers an alternate build stream called "Structure A," which is a Red Hat supported installation with kernel_alt packages. With Structure A you get more hardware exploitation, especially on IBM z14 and

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-22 Thread Neale Ferguson
Tks On 5/22/18, 10:59, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Daniel P. Martin" wrote: No info; not installed. (The image I'm poking with the Stick of Inquiry is not yet registered with an entitlement server.) On

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-22 Thread Daniel P. Martin
No info; not installed.  (The image I'm poking with the Stick of Inquiry is not yet registered with an entitlement server.) On 5/22/2018 9:45 AM, Neale Ferguson wrote: Thanks Dan. What about openssl-ibmpkcs11? On 5/22/18, 10:30, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Daniel P. Martin"

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-22 Thread Neale Ferguson
Thanks Dan. What about openssl-ibmpkcs11? On 5/22/18, 10:30, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Daniel P. Martin" wrote: On a recently installed RHEL 7.5 system...

Re: 7.5 package levels

2018-05-22 Thread Daniel P. Martin
On a recently installed RHEL 7.5 system... # cat /etc/os-release NAME="Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server" VERSION="7.5 (Maipo)" ID="rhel" ID_LIKE="fedora" VARIANT="Server" VARIANT_ID="server" VERSION_ID="7.5" PRETTY_NAME="Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.5 (Maipo)" ... 'yum info' shows me

7.5 package levels

2018-05-22 Thread Neale Ferguson
Hi, For those running 7.5 what level of the following packages come with that release? openssl-ibmca libica s390utils Neale -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to