Re: Application tools

2004-03-17 Thread Jim Knox
Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm curious (truly) as to why you would be installing Jetty instead of Tomcat or something along those lines. What advantages does Jetty have? Mark Post Mark... This is a little dated, but was covered on the peanut gallery:

Application tools

2004-03-16 Thread Davis, Larry
I have my network configured and I need to install some tools for my developers. JAVA SDK 1.4.2 Apache 2.0.43 Jetty 4.2.7 I found the IBM JAVA environment, but there is no JIT compiler, ultimately we will need that. What are the recommendations for these on S390 versions of Linux I am on a

Re: Application tools

2004-03-16 Thread Post, Mark K
] Subject: Application tools I have my network configured and I need to install some tools for my developers. JAVA SDK 1.4.2 Apache 2.0.43 Jetty 4.2.7 I found the IBM JAVA environment, but there is no JIT compiler, ultimately we will need that. What are the recommendations for these on S390

Re: Application tools

2004-03-16 Thread Davis, Larry
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Application tools I would say that what ever your Linux/390 distribution provider ships would be the recommended levels. I hadn't really heard of Jetty before, so I went looking for it. According to the web page for it, if you run Jetty, you don't need

Re: Application tools

2004-03-16 Thread Aria Bamdad
Larry, The issue with the JIT being disabled came up several times in the past months. Look at the list archives. As for Redhat, the JIT showed as disabled when I installed 1.4.1 on a Taroon AS 3.0. However, when I installed the same 1.4.1 SDK on Debian 3.01, JIT was enabled. Aria. On Tue, 16

Re: Application tools

2004-03-16 Thread Davis, Larry
I just found out the JIT is not needed for my user since that is more a Browser function than a Host function. Larry -Original Message- From: Aria Bamdad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Application tools Larry