Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-05 Thread Post, Mark K
: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael MacIsaac Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 8:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CTC Definition Problem > I was under the impression that all the distros included the needed > modules.conf entries. I.e. The entry has to be ther

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-05 Thread Michael MacIsaac
> I was under the impression that all the distros included the needed > modules.conf entries. I.e. The entry has to be there, but you don't have > to put it there. I believe this is true only if you add a device of that type during installation. -Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com (845)

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-05 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 03/04/2004 at 07:13 EST, "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There needs to be an entry in /etc/modules.conf to create a relationship > between the interface name (ctc#) and the module name (ctc.o) _if_ you want > the kernel to dynamically load ctc.o whenever interface ctc# is

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Post, Mark K
ssage- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CTC Definition Problem Thanks to everyone that responded, it got my mind subtasking. My problem was I had the wron

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Post, Mark K
used to be. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CTC Definition Problem On Thursday, 03/04/2004 at 06:16 EST, "Peter E. Abresch Jr.

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
Thanks to everyone that responded, it got my mind subtasking. My problem was I had the wrong UCB addresses for this particular LPAR. Sometimes all it takes is a little slapping around to jar things loose. Thanks again. Peter

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 03/04/2004 at 06:16 EST, "Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am missing something that is staring at me and I cannot see it. Do we > still have to create an alias for ctc0? If so, where do I create it? You need an entry in etc/chandev.conf. For example,

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread David Kreuter
/etc/modules.conf -Original Message- From: Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3/4/2004 6:16 PM Subject: Re: CTC Definition Problem I am missing something that is staring at me and I cannot see it. Do we still have to create an alias for ctc0? If so, where do I

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: CTC Definition Problem On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 16:56, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote: > I am having trouble defining a CTC between my Linux LPAR and my z/OS LPAR. > I have read the "Device Drivers and Installa

Re: CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Adam Thornton
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 16:56, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote: > I am having trouble defining a CTC between my Linux LPAR and my z/OS LPAR. > I have read the "Device Drivers and Installation Commands ? January 30, > 2004". What am I missing? ctc0 should be lower case. Adam

CTC Definition Problem

2004-03-04 Thread Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
I am having trouble defining a CTC between my Linux LPAR and my z/OS LPAR. I have read the "Device Drivers and Installation Commands ? January 30, 2004". What am I missing? Peter mainpepl:~ # insmod ctc ctc0:0x1063:0x1062 Using /lib/modules/2.4.21-102-default/kernel/drivers/s390/net/ctc.o main