On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Harder, Pieter
wrote:
> And now for the really stupid question: does enabling cpuplugd with CPU_MIN=1
> actually gain something? I have turned it on for one of my SAP dyadics and my
> idle level seems to have gone up instead of down. I now see cpu spikes at the
>With Linux on z/VM I do like the idea that reduced
>number of CPUs may improve chances of the virtual machine drop from
>queue nicely. But recent SAP releases have stuff that makes even the
>virtual 1-way stay in-queue, so there it does not help anymore.
And now for the really stupid question: do
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
wrote:
> I have been using the supplied example that had the minimum number of
> CPUs set to 2.
I don't think there is a real reason for having the minimum at 2.
Earlier this week I raised the question "why would you ever set the
minimum hi
Hello Listers,
We are a SAP shop. For some time now, I have been using cpuplugd to
control the number of CPUs that our batch servers have. This seems to
work fine.
I have been using the supplied example that had the minimum number of
CPUs set to 2.
Now I am looking at our production SAP dialo