Re: [Linux/390] Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-03 Thread Mike Kershaw
Further, be a bit careful with DHCP relays in this environment. While the MAC addresses generated by VM are in the 00-04-AC range allocated to IBM, they aren't guaranteed to be unique (hey, they're generated out of thin air!) in the network universe. If y'all think that's a Real Problem,

Re: [Linux/390] Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-03 Thread David Boyes
If y'all think that's a Real Problem, and not just an academic oddity, let us know and we'll take it under advisement. (For extra credit: Devise an algorithm which constructs world-unique virtual MAC addresses. Answers will be graded based on originality and legibility.) QD method

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-02 Thread Dennis Musselwhite
Hi David, You are correct... the capabilities flags for the QDIO simulation indicate the adapter has broadcast capabilities... and the qdio driver already knows what to do about that. From David Boyes: Good. Do we need new versions of the drivers to enable support for the new device

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 05/02/2002 at 08:58ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02.05.2002 at 04:56:58, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was about to suggest that. It's how ARP works - I've looked at tcpdump reports and seen it sending a message 'who is 192.168.1.5 and getting the

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-02 Thread Rich Smrcina
On Thursday 02 May 2002 11:06 am, you wrote: Further, be a bit careful with DHCP relays in this environment. While the MAC addresses generated by VM are in the 00-04-AC range allocated to IBM, they aren't guaranteed to be unique (hey, they're generated out of thin air!) in the network

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-02 Thread Rich Smrcina
Duh, well I obviously ciphered something wrongly :) On Thursday 02 May 2002 07:14 pm, you wrote: That's a good start, but unfortunately 6 hex digits for the 'manufacturer ID' and six digits for the serial number already fills up our 12 hex digit MAC address, and we're still not unique

DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-01 Thread David Boyes
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:34:21AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd expect DHCP to work within a guest LAN, but not to work to any other guest LAN or to the outside world without some more development to happen in terms of repeater tools and/or hardware. Another thought on the subject of

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-01 Thread Vic Cross
On 01.05.2002 at 23:55:40, Dennis Musselwhite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The guest LAN acts as a hub and delivers a copy of the broadcast packet to the data connection of every virtual adapter (NIC) coupled to that LAN regardless of the destination IP Address or the subnet mask. Ok, let's

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-01 Thread John Summerfield
On 01.05.2002 at 23:55:40, Dennis Musselwhite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The guest LAN acts as a hub and delivers a copy of the broadcast packet to the data connection of every virtual adapter (NIC) coupled to that LAN regardless of the destination IP Address or the subnet mask. Ok,

Re: DHCP, guest LANs

2002-05-01 Thread Vic Cross
On 02.05.2002 at 04:56:58, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was about to suggest that. It's how ARP works - I've looked at tcpdump reports and seen it sending a message 'who is 192.168.1.5 and getting the reply I am 192.168.1.5. Yep. ARP sends a broadcast, which everyone (on the