On 11/26/2010 07:52 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Testing away, rather than flood the list with these results where would you
like them sent?
system-config-lvm
Xlib: extension RANDR missing on display localhost:10.0.
Gdk-ERROR **: The program 'system-config-lvm' received an X Window System
Testing away, rather than flood the list with these results where would you
like them sent?
system-config-lvm
Xlib: extension RANDR missing on display localhost:10.0.
Gdk-ERROR **: The program 'system-config-lvm' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
Am 26.11.2010 19:52, schrieb Neale Ferguson:
Testing away, rather than flood the list with these results where would you
like them sent?
system-config-lvm
Xlib: extension RANDR missing on display localhost:10.0.
Gdk-ERROR **: The program 'system-config-lvm' received an X Window System error.
Patrick Spinler píše v St 24. 11. 2010 v 22:25 -0600:
On 11/24/10 10:14 PM, Patrick Spinler wrote:
Now, I just gotta start compiling some source rpms
Okay, now this is annoying, apparently there's not even a compiler
package available in the fedora spin ...
the installation repository is
Would it be possible to get install.img as an ext2/ext3 image rather than
squashfs? I don't have any Linuxen that has that filesystem driver and I don't
really want to go through an install of an intel image just to host that file.
On 11/24/10 12:38 PM, Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 25.11.2010 05:04, schrieb Patrick Spinler:
On 11/24/10 9:51 PM, Patrick Spinler wrote:
On 11/24/10 9:30 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Anyone got it to run in a virtual machine? I downloaded the img files and
used a variation of the REDHAT EXEC to punch them to the virtual reader. I IPL it
Am 25.11.2010 15:44, schrieb Neale Ferguson:
Would it be possible to get install.img as an ext2/ext3 image rather than
squashfs? I don't have any Linuxen that has that filesystem driver and I don't
really want to go through an install of an intel image just to host that file.
On 11/24/10
Getting rid of the cio_ignore parameter from the old generic.prm and adding
in the data so I could perform a kickstart using the fedora kickstart server
has got me on my way. However, I¹m getting the following during the
installation:
Could not allocate requested partitions:
not enough free space
Am 25.11.2010 17:44, schrieb Neale Ferguson:
Getting rid of the cio_ignore parameter from the old generic.prm and adding
in the data so I could perform a kickstart using the fedora kickstart server
has got me on my way. However, I¹m getting the following during the
installation:
Could not
The installer really should not care about LDL -vs- CDL. If it does, that's
a bug. Fix it.
-- R;
On Nov 25, 2010 12:22 PM, Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 25.11.2010 17:44, schrieb Neale Ferguson:
Getting rid of the cio_ignore parameter from the old generic.prm and
adding
in the
I took the default for dasdfmt and so it should be cdl:
cat /proc/dasd/devices;lsdasd
0.0.0150(ECKD) at ( 94: 0) is dasda : active at blocksize: 4096, 60084
0 blocks, 2347 MB
0.0.0151(ECKD) at ( 94: 4) is dasdb : active at blocksize: 4096, 60084
0 blocks, 2347 MB
0.0.0152(FBA
On 11/25/10 1:32 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
the installation repository is populated only with a limited set of
packages with rest available at
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/s390x/os/ You only need
to update the yum configuration after installation
On 11/25/10 11:21 AM, Karsten Hopp wrote:
Am 25.11.2010 17:44, schrieb Neale Ferguson:
Getting rid of the cio_ignore parameter from the old generic.prm and
adding
in the data so I could perform a kickstart using the fedora kickstart
server
has got me on my way. However, I¹m getting the
To get things going I copied anaconda-ks.cfg to a local webserver, got rid of
the clearpart and part statements and am now getting further. The original had
a size of 6GB which is greater than my 2 mod 3s. I tried to set up the part
stuff to use LVM but don't think I got the syntax correct as I
Hi everyone.
As the subject says, we're closing in on the final official Fedora 14
release for System Z. All know issues have by now been fixed and we're
now looking for a final round of testing.
In case you want to give us a hand in testing you can find more details
about how to help on
, November 24, 2010 12:39 PM
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
Cc: fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org; Linux on 390 Port
Subject: Fedora 14 for System Z needs testers!
Hi everyone.
As the subject says, we're closing in on the final official Fedora 14
release for System Z. All know
...@lists.fedoraproject.org; Linux on 390 Port
Subject: Fedora 14 for System Z needs testers!
Hi everyone.
As the subject says, we're closing in on the final official Fedora 14
release for System Z. All know issues have by now been fixed and we're now
looking for a final round of testing.
In case you want
On 11/24/10 8:00 PM, Patrick Spinler wrote:
I'll give a go at installing F14 on a mainframe this weekend.
Is there anything in particular to test, or just the base install?
-- Pat
Alright, I haven't finished the install yet, it's still running, but let
me just say that the initial install
Anyone got it to run in a virtual machine? I downloaded the img files and used
a variation of the REDHAT EXEC to punch them to the virtual reader. I IPL it
appears to be doing things but I never get anything on the console. I assume it
can write to a dumb terminal or at least a virtual HMC.
I take that back. I'm tracing the SVCs and am seeing attempted writes to the
console (SVC 04 with fd = 2 == stderr) and the text appears to be: cannot read
proc file system - 9 bad file descriptor. In fact, all the writes have
references to bad file descriptors in there. I'm not sure what I've
On 11/24/10 9:30 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Anyone got it to run in a virtual machine? I downloaded the img files and
used a variation of the REDHAT EXEC to punch them to the virtual reader. I
IPL it appears to be doing things but I never get anything on the console. I
assume it can write to
On 11/24/10 10:51 PM, Patrick Spinler spinler.patr...@mayo.edu wrote:
I can send you my exec, parm file, and directory entry if you'd like.
On 11/24/10 9:51 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Please
Here you go, just pasted inline here:
fdr1zl01 direct:
USER FDR1ZL01 512M 512M G
On 11/24/10 9:51 PM, Patrick Spinler wrote:
On 11/24/10 9:30 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Anyone got it to run in a virtual machine? I downloaded the img files and
used a variation of the REDHAT EXEC to punch them to the virtual reader. I
IPL it appears to be doing things but I never get
On 11/24/10 10:07 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Thanks, in my parm file I had a cio_ignore parameter. When I got rid of
that, I started getting messages.
(apologies for forwarding this to the list, also, but I think it may be
of general interest)
Makes sense. The fedora hercules readme talks
On 11/24/10 10:14 PM, Patrick Spinler wrote:
Now, I just gotta start compiling some source rpms
Okay, now this is annoying, apparently there's not even a compiler
package available in the fedora spin ...
Is my next option to try to compile gcc as a cross compiler, then
compile itself for the
25 matches
Mail list logo
